Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />City Code requires a minimum of 40%.open space, 10% of which must be identified asa common area <br />for use by residents of the development. The development exceeds open space requirements. <br /> <br />The development will be serviced by'municipal water and sewer. <br /> <br /> The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Rivenwick 3~d Addition subdivision at their <br /> August meeting: The Park Commission is recommending an 8-foot trail along Riverdale Drive extending <br /> from the western boundary line to Garnet Street. The trail will continue to extend along the northwest. <br /> side of Riverdale Park to the eastern edge of the park. Park dedication is recommended to be satisfied by <br /> a cash payment. <br /> <br /> The project is subject to the review and permitting process of the Lower Rum River Watershed <br /> Management Organization (WMO). <br /> <br /> MnDot requested that the City look af how-the traffic noise generated from U.S. Highway/ti 0 affects the <br /> proposed townhouse development.. It should be noted that the closest townhouse unit to U.S, Highway <br /> #10 is approximately 750 feet. Staff engaged the services of SRF Consulting firm to verify what <br /> requirements, if any, should be taken to address traffic noise from U.S. Highway #10. SRF his concluded <br /> that no noise mitigation should be required, as the traffic noise levels do not exceed MPCA standards. <br /> <br />.The proposed townhouse development is. required to comply with the Density Transitioning Ordinance. <br />The developer is proposing to satisfy density-transitioning requirements by the Landscape Buffering <br />option. The Density Transitioning Ordinance states that when an R-2 Medium Residential Development <br />abuts a R-1 Single Family development, the developer must provide a 25 foot wide buffer, in common <br />ownership, with a minimum of 2 over story trees, 2 evergreen trees, and 2 under story trees per 100 feet <br />of property abutting the adjacent R-I district. In this case, the development would be required to provide <br />72 trees. An established berm is located on the subject property that contains approximately 344 <br />established over story and under story trees. The berm and adjacent open space area significantly exceeds <br />25 feet and will be manicured and maintained by the Home Owners Association. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the preliminary plat on September 5, 2002. <br />During the public hearing, a few citizens inquired about how the proposed ponds would be, maintained, <br />what the proposed tot lot would consist of, and how the increase [n traffic would affect the. intersection of <br />Riverdale Drive and Garnet Street. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission tabled the item on September 5, 2002 and directed staff engage the services of <br />a consulting firm to conduct a traffic generation analysis for the. proposed development, discuss with the <br />developer the cost of upgrading the existing- signals on U.S. Highway #10-and how the cost is to be <br />distributed, and provide clarification on how the existing berm will be maintained. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission met on October 10, 2002 and continued to review the proposed Rivenwick 3'd <br />Addition development. There was no citizen input during the continuation of the public hearing. <br /> <br />Staff engaged the services of SRF to' complete a traffic generation analysis for the.proposed.development. <br />The traffic generation analysis concluded that all key:interSections,- with the exception of Sunfish Lake <br />Blvd. and Highway #10, would operate at acceptable levels of service with full buildout Of the proposed <br />development. The intersection of Sunfish Lake Blvd. and Highway #t 0 is scheduled' to be improved:with <br />dual southbound left turn lanes and separate left turn, through and right turn lanes on the northbound leg, <br />The. poor level of service at this intersection is due to the general increase in traffic on Highway #10.and <br />not solely based on the proposed t0wnhouse development. <br /> <br />MnDot has stated that the intersection of U.S. Highway #10 and Ramsey Blvd. must be upgraded to <br />facilitate this development. Staff engaged the services of SRF to Provide a cost estimate to upgrade U.S. <br />Highway #10. The intersection of Highway #10 and. Ramsey Blvd. must be modified from a tee-type <br />intersection to a cross intersection to facilitate the western access to this Subdivision. The cost of <br /> <br /> <br />