Agenda - Council - 01/14/2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I i I I ! I I I I I I I I I i I ~RF ~onsul%in~ Group In¢ ?$S 475 ~42~ Mr. Steve Jankowski -Il- November 26, 2002 The year 2025 analysis assumes the same directional distribution used for the year 2005 analysis'. The combination of back~ound traffic and trips generated by the future development is shown in Figure 6 for year 2025, for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, As shown in Table 5, both intersections are expected to operate. a't unacceptable levels of service during the peak hours, The poor levels of service are due to the high demand and lack of capacity to accommodate peak hour volumes. The level of service results at the intersection of TH 10/Ramsey Boulevard are metered by wes(bound capacity constraints at TI-I 10/Sunfish Lake Boulevard. Operations at both intersections' are expected to improve to acceptable levels with the-recommended geometric improvements displayed in Figure 6. These improvements include southbound dual left-turn lanes, a separate through and right-turn lane for the north :approach and a second left-turn lane for the east approach' at the TH .10/Ramsey Boulevard intersection. In addition, a third through lane in each direction is' needed: along. TH i0. Based on the. recommended improvements, the northbound approach of the intersection of TH: 10fR. amsey Boulevard will require 100-120 feet of right-of-way. Table 5 Year 2025 Capacity Analysis with Recommended Year 2005 ImproVements Level of Service Results ......... ' 'Level of Service Intersection ' A.M. Peak P.M, Peak '" TI~ I 0/RamseT. B..oulevarci E~ E~ ' TH 10/Sunfish Lake Boulevard F F Level of service results metered by westbound capacity constraints at TH 10/Sunfish Lake Boulevard. p.12 -147~