Laserfiche WebLink
would cost $250,000 and up. There seems to be lots of latitude in price, so he questions <br />homes could have this much impactl <br /> <br />Julie Horn, 6031 145t~ Lane, adviSed that a committee had been formed <br />development, and they-hadbeen firm this was a PUD. She stated <br />children in kindergarten or younger. She added there are several pools as' <br />walls..She stated with people walking on a path that' abuts these <br />children, are .more vulnerable. She added there is already <br />unnecessary. She Stated the residents were very-clear they didn*t' <br />that at Tungsten there were at least six buses that picked· up <br />.coming off 145th. She voiced concern about connecting <br />which would increase risk to the children riding, the bus. <br />has risen all around the Twin Cities, it is still very Ram,~ <br /> <br /> this <br /> <br />large Lg <br />the <br /> <br /> s. Horn stated <br /> can be blinding <br /> g traffic, <br />while the cost of <br /> <br />Mark Labonne, 5991 148' AVenue NW, asked that <br />this property affects decisions on the other side of the street: <br />cautioned the Commission to be careful with their decision. <br /> <br /> a decision on <br />a much larger area. He <br /> <br />Eric ·Watson, 6000 146t~ Avenue st~ <br />matters relating to this <br />indicated there is a tree break <br />stated he was glad to hear <br />concerned that this group of trees <br /> <br />a COmmissioner he has t to vote on any <br /> his a to comment. He <br /> t~' abutS to his Own. He <br /> trees, however, he-was <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked~2~f the trees are <br /> <br />Mr. Watson not. He <br /> <br />stated it <br />the property, g a trail <br /> <br /> drops off where the street would <br /> <br /> was not as important as on the east. He <br /> than the south trail, and looks deeper into <br />feet off ~your property is .more intrusive than one <br /> <br /> ,et He added that if it is important to have a trail there for buffer pUrpoSes <br /> address the~coaC~}!~of the neighbors. · - <br /> <br /> Motion by ~:~erson ~econded by Comss~oner Jonson, to approve ~e sketch plm. <br />~ . ~ . x? . . . - <br />~, conangent up~}[o~ ph~ee w~th .~e C~W Staff Revmw Le2er dated Decmber 27, 2002 ~d <br />~¢1~,. w~ ms~ c~o¢~p ~e .develop~ to address ~e dens~ ~d private versus pubhc.road ~ssues. <br /> <br /> ~"~:j}~?;.Motion C~~' Vo~g Yes: Crab,son Nixt, Co~issioners Jonson, Brauer, Kocisc~ <br /> ~-z,.~R~ve ~(~n Scoy. Voting No: None. Abstaining: Co~tssmner Watson. Absent: None. <br /> <br /> ca~? Zon~g Bu~e~ <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 2, 2003 <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />