My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:45:07 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 11:48:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-34- <br /> <br />Further discussion: Mayor Gamec stated that his concern is if they take this action are they going <br />to have to go through this discussion with every priority street light. Councilmember <br />Zimmerman replied that most people probably don't care. Mr. Jagerson noted that there is also <br />an intersection on his property going into Traprock Park and he does not want to see a light there <br />in the future either. City Engineer Jankowski replied that that intersection is on the priority street <br />light schedule, but will not be done this year. Mayor Gamec inquired if it will even be possible <br />for Connexus to install the light this year with the delay. Mr. Offerman replied that they do have <br />winter charges going into affect, which would be the only difference. Mayor Gamec stated that <br />he would personally prefer to have the light installed, but if they do what is in the motion it will <br />take another 60 days so maybe should the delay it and look at it at a different time. He <br />recommended that they stop the project this year and move it until next year. City Engineer <br />Olson stated that Mr. Jagerson has stated that he does not want a light at the intersection going <br />into the park so how does staff address that issue. He questioned who does staff notify when <br />they do decide to install the light at 158th and Variolite in the future, He expressed concern that <br />they might be setting precedent. Councilmember Kurak stated that she personally thinks that <br />asking residents their opinion is great; but when they are talking about priority lighting they are <br />walking down a slippery slope. She stated that if the light is not warranted at this time she would <br />prefer to place the light at a different intersection. City Engineer Jankowski stated that they can <br />place the intersection of 158th and Variolite as the last intersection to receive a light. <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that they have already set precedent in some extent to do what <br />the citizens want. <br /> <br />The motion was amended to remove the priority street light for the intersection of 158th and <br />Variolite at this time and address it at a later date, but noting that they should take intO acc°unt <br />the wishes of the residents. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Mr. Jagerson inquired if he could be notified the next time the issue will be <br />discussed. Mayor Gamec replied that that is difficult for them to do. Councilmember <br />Hendriksen suggested that Mr. Jagerson let them know what the consensus is of the <br />neighborhood regarding the light. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec and Councilmembers Hendriksen, Anderson, Kurak, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Mr. Jagerson stated that the light poles along Alpine Drive don't match and inquired if. something <br />could be done s° that they would match. Mr. Offerman replied that he would look into that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that at the intersection of 156th Lane and T.H. 47 there is a <br />priority light and inquired as to how,Connexus determines what angle the light should face. <br /> <br />Mr. Offerman revieWed how the lighting is determined for an intersection and how the policy has <br />changed over the years because photometrics have changed. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/November 19, 2002 <br /> Page 4 of 15 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.