My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:45:07 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 11:48:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-70- <br /> <br /> it clear that the current platted Riverdale Drive' intersection cannot be changed until the <br /> appropriate government agency is able to take control of the property and at this point, the <br /> County is unable to determine when that will occur. Since Riverdale Drive is a designated MSA <br /> · road, the Council inquired whetherRiverdale Drive could be constrUcted to temporary standards <br /> until the realignment of Riverdale Drive occurred. MnDot would require Riverdale Drive to be <br /> constructed to MSA standards, however, there are measures the City could take to reduce road <br /> constrUction cost. The City Council also questioned if the placement of the 12-inch waterline <br /> would be affected if, Riverdale Drive were to be relocated. Staff. and the developer have <br />' discussed this issue and determined that. the 12-inch waterline could be placed so that it would <br /> not need to be relocated even if Riverdale Drive is required to be realigned in the future. The <br /> City Council tabled action on the proposed preliminary plat for Rivenwick 3~ Addition atthe <br /> November 12, 2002 meeting. The realignment of Riverdale Drive will only be required when the <br /> land to the south of the project area is developed and accessed as a Regional Park and when <br /> development occurs west of the subject property. The City is aware that MnDot anticipates <br /> upgrading the signalization at the intersection of Highway # 10 and Ramsey Boulevard in the year <br /> 2004. The City participation would be $5,000 if the City constructs the intersection of Highway <br /> #10 and Ramsey Boulevard as a f,our-legged intersection prior to MnDot beginning their <br /> resignalization project. The City Council had previously discussed whether or not the City <br /> should reqUire an escrow from the developer for the cost to realign Riverdale Drive in the future. <br /> Since the realignment of Riverdale Drive would be required only if and when future development <br /> occurs to the south and west, it seems more reasonable to require the developer to incur the cost <br /> of improvements required as a result of their project, namely upgrading the signalization at <br /> Highway #10 and Ramsey Boulevard. Staff is also recommending that the City Council approve <br /> the preliminary plat with the alignment of Riverdale Drive as proposed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if the right-of-way line and the location of the fence along <br />Ramsey Boulevard will be a problem. · <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that that' is the information he requested the developer provide. <br />The preliminary plat did not show how C.R. #56 aligns with this. Staff did review the issue and <br />there is some room, but the developer has been requested'to get the ultimate right of, wayat the <br />time of.preliminary plat and they estimate that it would be 100 to 150 feet. ' '" <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if they would be taking the extra footage-from the property .the <br />developer owns and how does that affect the road. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that they are requesting that the developer dedicate as mUch land <br />as possible to assure that the road aligns. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired as to what measures the City could take to reduce the cost of <br />constructing the road. <br /> <br />City Council/January 14, 2003 <br /> Page 10 of 27 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.