My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:45:42 PM
Creation date
6/23/2003 12:04:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/25/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
from the front porch. He added that the garages are set back on the <br /> for driveway lengths from 22 to 26 feet. <br />· Narrower road right-of-way than required. He noted the current regul <br /> that urban streets have at least 60 feet of dedicated public r <br /> development shows 50 feet public fight-of-ways. <br />· Narrower constructed street widths. He advised current re <br /> public streets.are 32 feet wide as measured fi.om back <br /> submitted preliminary plat shows public streets as bein <br /> 'from back of curb to back of curb. <br />· Private streets through the <br /> Trudgeon demonstrated how. the long pdvat~ woul&~ <br /> streets, with greenspace inside. He indicated was <br /> no on-street parking. <br /> <br />require <br />,osed <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if the City Council Wanted the <br /> <br />Principa! Planner Trudgeon indicated they wanted the <br />stated the layout on page 37 road at a <br />comfortable with that, so the <br /> <br />ulre an <br />of <br />as <br /> <br /> Principal planner <br /> off.to one-way <br />feet at minimum, with <br /> <br />)ace. He <br />was not <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon <br />either 20'percent public open space <br />the Park Commission did not <br />development, mostly due. to the <br />and Sunfish Lake Boutex~ard. He stated <br />50 percent <br />and green <br /> <br />Staff will be <br /> <br /> uires development have <br /> space. He advised that <br /> open space within the <br />corner of the Sunwood Drive <br />development have at least <br />the development shows 64 percent open <br />that as part of the PUD process, the <br />architectural elevations. He stated.that <br />plan review. However since the plat is <br />a site' plan is 'not required, therefore <br />a site plan review. He indicated that in general, <br /> <br /> site plan is ent on what is as part of the PUD'and what is shown on the <br />~~~ary plat. ~.eJ that the landscaping plan, as shown, is.deficient in the number of' <br /> ptantmg~_.~mrect m~ ~ o~ ~mance, and ~rarr Will De worrdng w~th the cteveloper ro correct <br /> this. He s~the ttec ~alevatmns of the umts that will be used m the development are at <br /> a mn-nmum ~45 squ~l~et m s~ze, which exceeds the reqmrements.under the ordinance. He <br /> md~cated the ~¢nor mat'enals will be of wnyl s~d~ng and asphalt, shingling on the roof. :He <br /> noted that the '~osed units will have front porches: <br /> <br /> Trudgeon explained that Staff had concerns with the road widths, from a safety <br /> that City Engineering, Public Works, Police Department and Fire <br /> ed concerns about the use of narrower roads than typically is required in <br /> subdivisions. He indicated they felt that the narrower roads do not provide <br /> f~efiScient movement of vehicles, Which leads to operational concerns regarding snow. plowing <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 6, 2003 <br /> Page 8 of 26 <br /> <br />-172- <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.