Agenda - Council - 03/11/2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Shepherd, Van Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: None. Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by CommissiOner Brauer that the City Council approve Janis Day's request for a home occuPation perrnit~ of fact. Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt; Commiss~on~ers Jo , Brauer, Shepherd, Van Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absen Case #3 Request for an Intemm Use Pernut to ~w Outdoor Storage of Vehicles and Equipment on a Resi~h~aily Zoned Pared; Case of Bauer '~ ' ~- Associate Pl~er Wald explained that ~e Ci~ received '~;~mpla~t in NOvember of 2002,' reposing that Able Paving and Cons~ction was st°dng~ek commercial vehicles and equipment ~d possibly operating branch omce on ~e Prope~:~'[0c~*::'~t 16130 V~olite Street, also ~own ~ the St. prop~. Associat~ ~ r Wald indicated that Ge~ Bauer is the owner of,:ffi~:~;~: whch is now cal[~::Ramsey Shooting Center. Staff contacted Mr. Bauer;~?NoG~ber 14, that ~e ~sey Shooting Center is a' legal non-confoming use, ~owever':~ditional on the subject Property would. be a violation of City Code. She in~i~ated th~:i~. 2i~ Staff ~d stated he is leasing a portion of the subject prop~ tO~¢le Pavin Consmction, who is utilizing the prope~ for og~,~4~::.~.torage of ~eir d~ercial veh, and equipment. She indicated Bauer is re~u~-Sfih:~:~'~a~efim use pemi~:, allow for outside storage of co~cial ve~cles ~d equipmeg!(~'fi~ the subj~ prope~ for aP~?~hmm¢lY a 2-ye~ pehod. Xss°ciate Plier Wald advisef~'is Sta~s opi~n ~at the reque~ re co~ercial vehcles ~d equipment on ~e subje~if{~rope~ is noV'~e most desirable~?~or ~e subject pr0pe~. She indicated Staff is concemed~ the 6:00}~m~t~g t~e ~d ~e co~erc~al na~e of ~e bus~ness ~ncreas~ng in activi~5~uhng. ~u~er ~{h'~;~hen cons~ction is 'm its busieSt time. Staff is also. concerned ~:~hmcal work being peffo~ed on site and excess· consmction ~d paving .~.,:,products being'~B~,ught to ~e prope~. ' ' ~' Assd~te Plier ~[&.in~:hted that Staff is reco~ending de~al of ~e request at' ~s time. She explained that Sta~[~;;of the op~mon that ~e. su~ound~ng res~dentml neighborhood could be negativel~!~ffected by~'[ incre~e ~ ~amc and co~erciat vehicle nOise ~at Will be generaed by ~e na~g:: of Able Paving's business, 'especi~ly 'during ~e b~y cons~ction se~on. She stated Staf~)~ also concerned ~at' if ~eCi~ ~anted ~e ~tefim me pemt allowing. outdoor sto~gge of vehicles and equipment and did not pemt mechmc~ wori on site or product to be bmu~t to the site, the oppo~W to peffom a quick mechmcal fix or Store excess ':~}~produc~:~might is ~eatly increased.· -She added· that ~ email had been. received from a ~??i~B6~i' opposing the request, w~ch was distributed to ~e Co--ssi°n. Gi~en Input Chairperson Nixt opened the Public Hearing at 7~ 10 p.m. Planning Commission/February 6, 20.03 Page 3 of 26 ·-181-