Laserfiche WebLink
(2) <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />_(5) <br /> <br />(6) <br /> <br />(7) <br /> <br />(8) <br /> <br />(9) <br /> <br /> CITY OF RAMSEY <br />Street Maintenance Program Assessment Practices <br /> <br />Projects are identified by.individual subdivisions, or'by grouping of-subdivision <br />and lots having similar pavement histories and conditions and similar.pavement <br />areas per benefited'unit. <br /> <br />An assessment-, share will be calculated by 'determining the t'otal assessable cost of <br />the project and dividing by the number of benefited units. ' '. <br /> <br />Where and individual lc~t has more than one frontage and not ail.frontages are <br />scheduled to receive an improvement, or the same type of improvements, the 'lot <br />will be considered benefited and be assessed a' full share for the improvement <br />which is conducted along the frontage of the' lot that contains the main ~riveway <br />opening. <br /> <br />For sealcoats and overlays the amount assessed to benefited property owner is <br />50% of the total project Cost including overhead costs. (1991) <br /> <br />Projects involving streets which have had previous proposed maintenance Projects <br />defeated by petition Shall be inelig/ble to receive the City's 50% contribution, if <br />the project requires a more expensive m.aintenance. (i.e. streets proposed for <br />· sealcoating project which was defeated by citizen petition now are proposed for a <br />.bituminous overlay) - (1993) <br /> <br />Where the rule of.dividing the assessable project .cost by the number of.benefited <br />un/ts (no 2 above) would result in an assessable share wh/ch is grossly out .of <br />proportions to the assessable share being charged to sirdlar lots receiving similar <br />'improvements, the City CounciI may elect to assess such lots the a,~erage <br />assessable share being made to lots receiving similar' improvements for that <br />project year. (1996) <br /> <br /> Where a benefited area contains commercial lots having widely varyingsizes, the <br /> assessment shall be made based on area. of the lot.' (2003) <br /> <br />'Where an individual .lot has more than one frontage including a'ddveway frontage <br />on a state or county road, and a non-driveway frontage on a MSA or city street, <br />one-half assessment share will be made for an improvement to the MSA or City <br />street. .(1995) <br /> <br />Where an individual 'lot has a. single frontage on an MSA street, shch lots will. be <br />'assessed the average assessable Share for the type of improvement made to non- <br />MSA streets receiving that improvement. . (i992): <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />! <br /> <br /> <br />