My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/07/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/07/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:41:46 AM
Creation date
6/4/2007 7:51:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/07/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ISSUES POSTED WITH DISCUSSION NOTES <br /> <br />ISSUE: Transportation. Mary Jo Olson <br />. Expanding existing corridors (Armstrong and Ramsey Blvd) <br />. Encourage and leverage Northstar (and beyond) <br />. Trade-off of cul de sacs vs. interconnectivity: <br />o Privacy vs. convenient transport <br />o Safer - which way? <br />. Infrastructure for alternative fuels <br /> <br />ISSUE: Walkability. Ralph H. <br />. This needs to be part of the development process <br />o New & integrated into existing <br />o Pets <br />. Family friendly <br />. A valid alternative <br />. Let's be proactive <br />oWe canlt wait for development <br />. Integrate what already exists <br />. Plan for daily destinations within reasonable distances (defrnition needed) <br />o Recreation - plan there <br />o Others - no plan <br />. Safety First - neighbors watching each other <br />. Plan has to make this inviting <br />. Education <br /> <br />ISSUE: Group A-ll:30-12:30 SAT. reached agreement on the following 5 pages <br />including all 3 points on page 5. Terry Hendriksen. <br />. The City Council should represent the Citizens of Ramsey not outside interest <br />. New development should not be allowed to change the essential character of an <br />established neighborhood <br />. The concept of density transitioning has been perverted into an ineffective screening <br />ordinance <br />. If sewer and water is proposed to pass your home you are a stakeholder and should be <br />allowed to petition AGAINST the public improvement project <br />. Should we amend the City Charter to: (include in complaint) <br />1. Control subsidizing of residential development - OK <br />2. Make homeowners stakeholders permitted to petition for or against the <br />extension of sewer and water if it is proposed to pass their property - OK <br />3. Create true density transition! ! ! <br /> <br />ISSUE: Butterflies <br />. TIP financing not sustainable <br />. Housing density sib reduced <br /> <br />City of Ramsey Open Space Event notes <br />May 4-5, 2007 <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />135 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.