Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Zoning Bulletin <br /> <br />lector's own use in order to restore, preserve and maintain a spe- <br />cial interest vehicle for historic LT1terest." Although Hawkinson <br />had acquired vehicles, he had not treated them as required uD.d~! <br />the ordinance and was therefore not considered a collector. ..... <br />Hawkinson also argued that one of the vehicles, a van that he <br />had planned to remove from its chassis and place on the ground, <br />was not a car but an accessory building. Hawkinson had applied <br />for and received a building permit to add an accessory structUre <br />to his property in 2003, but he never removed the van from its <br />chassis. The van could have been considered an accessory build- <br />ing had Hawkinson ever removed it from its chassis, but, at the <br />time of trial, the van was still considered a vehicle and the permit <br />had expired. The court had not erred in determining that the van <br />was also "junk" and ordering it removed from the property. <br />Hawkinson also challenged the removal of the weeds, which <br />he claimed were allowed under the collector provision requiring <br />that collector's vehicles be screened from ordinary public view by <br />means of a "fence, rapidly growing trees, shrubbery or other ap- <br />propriate means." However, as it was established that Hawkin- <br />son was not a collector, this argument was without merit. <br />The decision of the lower court was affirmed. <br /> <br /> <br />""F).!.ii~C"~~~~,.?i'~'"' <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />164 <br />