Laserfiche WebLink
-150- <br /> <br />Response. A follow-up report on the design details of the County-owned outlet route <br />south of TH 10 has been prepared, and will be added as Appendix J in the revised <br />AUAR. The report will be presented to the County Public Works and Parks Committees <br />in early June. If these Committees agree that the route can be used, a recommendation <br />will go to the County Board for action. Negotiations for development of the con'idor for <br />drainage and parks use would then begin in earnest among the County, City and RTC <br />developer. <br /> <br />If the County-owned route is not allowed, alternative routes will need to be purs'ued. The <br />draft AUAR did not specify a route, other than a'suggestion that the current route <br />southeastward along TH 10 could be pursued (Item 17, Runoff Under Developed <br />Conditions). This discussion is expanded in the AUAR revision to identify two possible <br />outlets, in addition to the TH 10 route. The Rivenwick Development to the southeast of <br />the RTC site and the Alpaca Development to the southwest both have small outlet pipes <br />draining the immediate developments. Discussions with the City and its consultant <br />engineer have identified these as two possible connections between RTC and the River. <br />Details on these two connections will be evaluated if discussions with the County on the <br />original outlet do not lead to County approval to use the route. <br /> <br />Comment #4. In response to changes made in Item 18 requested by MCES, Bolton & <br />Me~¢, Inc. (David Martini) reviewed the Item and Appendix G on behalf of the City of <br />Ramsey and submitted 10 comments. <br /> <br />Response. The following responses were prepared for the City: <br /> <br />Comment 4.1: Section 1Bb. Paragraph 2 - The Sewer plan refers to an available capacity <br />in the downstream facilities of 2.8 MGD. 7.87 MGD is the ultimate flow at full build out <br />shown in the (1991) Comprehensive Sewer Plan and is the flow that has been used to <br />design the existing system. <br /> <br />Response: Paragraph 2 of Section 18.b has been modified as follows: <br /> The City's Comprehensive Plan documented MCES Projected Wastewater flows <br /> for the City of Ramsey to be between 542 and 668 MGY or a maximum of 1.8 <br /> MGD. The Sewer Plan indicated that at full build out, including Rural Areas, <br /> 7.87 MGD of flow would be generated. The MCES interceptors and the City's <br /> collection system have been designed for this ultimate flow at full build-out. <br /> However, because of bottlenecks in the MCES system downstream of Ramsey, <br /> maximum average daily flows are currently limited to an allocation of <br /> approximately 3.8 MGD. Therefore, it appears the existing collection system is <br /> sized to handle the flows projected in this report. <br /> <br />Comment 4.2: Section 18b. Paragraph 3 - I am not sure if2.8 MGD is 30% of the <br />capacity at the Anoka lift station. The Comprehensive Sewer Plan states that 2.8 MGD is <br />approximately 35% of the ultimate flow at full build out. <br /> <br />34-2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />