Agenda - Council - 05/27/2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-154- the impact of this discharge and the assumptions used in evaluating it, which include use for drainage fi'om the future upgrade of TH 10. A Mn/DOT permit will be sought once the final route is established. The Rivenwick development currently provides its own drainage. Its relationship to the ultimate drainage plan developed for the RTC site remains to be determined. However, the City, County and Mn/DOT will all be involved in this final determination once the drainage route is finalized. During preparation of the wetland replacement plan, the property owner(s) abutting drainage area 10 will be contacted to determine their willingness to convey easements to the City for the wetland restoration and buffer establislzment. It is also assumed'that any work within this wetland will also be reviewed for DNR Protected Waters Permit requirements as ,,veil. The PVC credits estimated for drainage area 10 is 3.79 acres for wetland restoration and 1.80 acres for wetland buffer establislm~ent. This would provide a total of 5.59 acres of PVC for drainage area 10. This assumes an approximately 50-foot buffer around the entire wetland. The exact PVC credits for restoring the existing wetland and for buffer establistm~ent within drainage area 10, will be not be determined until a final determination is made as to wetland replacement requirements for the entire Ramsey Station project. Comment 6.3' Any work on, or affecting Mn/DoT Right of Way will require a permit, including access, drainage, or other impacts. A Mn/DOT permit contact is given. Response: Table 8. l changed to reflect the need for a permit for any work within a M~/DOT Right of Way. Comment 6.4: As a reminder, Ramsey Blvd. is County State Aid (CSAH) Route 56. Sunfish Lake Blvd. NW is CSAH Route 571 Any work on a CSAEI route must meet State Aid rules and policies. Also, the County must review any changes to its County State Aid system so that they stay within its system limits. Please note that both CSAH 56, and CSAH 57 are within Anoka County's jurisdiction and the County must have the Opportunity to review and comment on the proposed development as well. Information sources on State Aids rules and policies, and a Mn/DOT contact are given. Response: MMA reSpbns~ et~¢t~a Comment 6.5: Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three complete copies of plats and two copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to submit- these when a project is initiated will lead to delay. This is offered as advisory comment. Response: Advisory comment acknowledged. Comment tt7. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) submitted the following set of comments, with Comment 7.14 submitted as an amendment after the first set: 34-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I