Laserfiche WebLink
-156- <br /> <br />flooding problems do not occur. This approach is required by the LRRWMO. Follow-up <br />implementation of BMPs to enhance infiltration, filtration and detention will be a design <br />detail that will likely lead to additional reduced runoff, Appendix J ,,vas developed after the <br />release of the draft AUAR document in response to discussions with the County about the <br />nature of the drainage outlet fi'om TH 10 to the River. Details on runoff minimization <br />BMPs will be an element of design as the project develops. Please refer also to responses <br />for Comments #3, 7.13 and 12.10. The comment on outflow elevations is acknowledged. <br /> <br />Comment 7.4: The document accurately indicates that DNR Water Appropriation permit <br />No. 85-6005 will need to be amended as additional wells are added to increase {he <br />municipal water supply due to the added development. It also mentions that monitoring <br />of the surficial aquifer is recommended to determine more accurately whether there is an <br />effect on the water table by withdrawals fi'om the Franconia-Ironton-Galesville aquifer. <br />Some ~'orrn of monitoring will likely be a requirement of the permit process. <br /> <br />The statement of page 13-8 that the "wetlands in question experience natural drying <br />during periods of low precipitation. The photographic history...shows wetland in the <br />vicinity of the RTC site disappearing during the mid to late 1980s, which is prior to the <br />development of the municipal wells. This same phenomenon occurs again in the mid to <br />late 1990s and prior to the installation ofwells 4 and 5" contradicts the statement on page <br />12-4 that a...photographic analysis showed that for the period 1981 through 1996, the <br />acreage of wetlands remained fairly constant. Begirming in 1997, however, the acreage <br />of wetlands visible on the aerial photography declined sharply." <br /> <br />Response: The discussion in "Groundwater-Surface Water Interaction and Wetland <br />Impacts" in Item I2 has been modified to address the comments. <br /> <br />Comment 7.5: The document lacks discussion of water conservation in the new <br />development. The DNR would like to kmow if"low water use" landscaping would be <br />used to minimize irrigation, as well as whether flow restrictors, watering bans, or other <br />water conservation measures will be promoted. <br /> <br />Response: To reduce peak water usage in areas served by the municipal water system, <br />the City of Ramsey has implemented an odd/even day sprinkling ban, pursuant to City <br />Code 4.40.06 subd. 10. Residents may water on odd numbered days if your address ends <br />in an odd number, and on even numbered days if your address ends in an even number. <br />The sprinkling restriction includes no watering between 10:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. since a <br />significant amount of water is lost due to evaporation during the hot portions of the day. <br />Homeowners xvith automated systems are strongly encouraged to program them to <br />operate after 10:00 p.m. This minimizes evaporation and lessens peak demand 6~n the <br />system. <br /> <br />In addition to the residential sprinkling ban, the City is in the process of implementing an <br />irrigation policy that is specific to townhouse, multifamily residential and commercial <br />comaections to the municipal water supply that requires that: <br /> · All in'igation systems must install an approved backflow device <br /> <br />34-8 <br /> <br /> <br />