My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 1:24:08 PM
Creation date
6/22/2007 11:51:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/26/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
458
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Van Scoy asked if the removal of the parking on the south end will impact the <br />overall assessment of the parking. <br />Assistant Community Development Director Frolik replied been o , the increased and ing was <br />are rig 11 52 <br />plan at 52. The shared parking on the PSD block <br />spaces available. As the facility grows it is her understanding that the shared parking agreement <br />will allow additional parking for this facility. <br />Commissioner Van. Scoy asked if some of the parking <br />through. <br />Assistant Community Development Director <br />facility will actually gain more opportunities <br />the center of the block. <br />be removed. The <br />; anhey grow in <br />after the <br />Chairperson Nixt <br />expansion. <br />Mr. Fedors indicated the appearance would <br />extend all the way to the sidewalk and the <br />Chairperson Nixt verified with the <br />recommendations included in the S1 <br />the site plan review requirements : <br />review by the RTC Technical AI.- r, <br />Assistant Community Dev <br />the Advisory Committee Y <br />that site plan the <br />The canopy will <br />ve any issues with the staff <br />1, 2007. He questioned how <br />nt situation of there being no <br />actor Fro ed it has been a great deal of time since <br />Thoruhg interdepartmental reviews, Staff is making sure <br />recommendation is not required by State law. <br />cing within the current constraints they are not <br />comfortable with the <br />if the Commission is comfortable with the procedure. <br />Chairperson Nixt s as no reason to believe otherwise. <br />evaluated the code _ x -, looked at the constraints of the <br />requirements seem to have been met. <br />Staff has pointed it out that they <br />development agreement. The <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated he is not uncomfortable with the capability of staff to evaluate, <br />but this board was put in place to provide additional review based on citizen input. <br />when the road is put <br />—154— Planning Commission/ June 7, 2007 <br />Page 13 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.