My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 06/26/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 1:24:08 PM
Creation date
6/22/2007 11:51:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/26/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
458
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />more drawn to an age- restricted building, which is among the products recommended in this re- <br />port. <br />General Occupancy Rental <br />There is an identified need for more market rate and affordable general occupancy rental units in <br />Ramsey to serve workforce households. Our recommended rental concept is shown in Table 29, <br />including unit mix, sizes and rents. <br />The affordable units in Table 29 (restricted to households earning 50% to 60% of median income <br />— or about $31,000 to $37,000 for two- person households) would satisfy need from many <br />younger households in entry -level jobs in Ramsey and the surrounding area. Market rate units <br />would also satisfy a portion of the demand from workforce households with incomes slightly too <br />high to qualify for subsidized/affordable units. It should also be noted, however, that because of <br />high land, material, and labor costs, the rents for a market rate building to be financially feasible <br />may be too high for the community to even draw much of its target market — moderate- to aver - <br />age- income younger households. Thus, to reduce development costs for the market rate units, <br />we recommend a mixed- income rental building that includes both affordable and market rate <br />units. <br />As shown in Table 29, we recommend a mixed - income apartment building with 205 to 240 units. <br />Sixty percent of the units (125 to 140 units) should be market rate, totaling 125 to 140 units. The <br />remaining 40% of units should be affordable to households at a mix of those at 50% and 60% of <br />—298— MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 59 <br />TABLE 29 <br />RECOMMENDED <br />RENTAL HOUSING COMMUNITY <br />CITY OF RAMSEY <br />January 2006 <br />AFFORDABI,E.UNITS,: AT SO °lo: TO 60* NViEDi N INCOME , <br />Pct. of <br />Square Affordable Rent/ <br />Unit Type Units <br />Feet Rate Sq. Ft. <br />1BR 30% - 35% <br />775 - 800 $675 - $700 $0.87 - $0.88 <br />2BR 50% - 60% <br />1,025 - 1,075 $825 - $925 $0.80 - $0.86 <br />3BR 10% -15% <br />1,250 - 1,325 $1,000 - $1,050 $0.80 - $0.79 <br />Total 80 -100 <br />1VIiRKETRATE'UIVITS' <' <br />1BR 35% -40% <br />800 - 825 $875 - $950 $1.09 - $1.15 <br />2BR 45% - 55% <br />1,075 - 1,175 $1,150 - $1,300 $1.07 - $1.11 <br />- 3BR- - 10 %- 15 % - - <br />- -1 -;300- - -1- ,400 -- $1,400---- $1�500 - - - -- $1.08 - -- $1.07_ <br />Total 125 - 140 <br />Note: recommended rents are in 2006 dollars and can be trended upward by 2.5% <br />annually until opening. <br />Source: Maxfield Research, Inc. <br />As shown in Table 29, we recommend a mixed - income apartment building with 205 to 240 units. <br />Sixty percent of the units (125 to 140 units) should be market rate, totaling 125 to 140 units. The <br />remaining 40% of units should be affordable to households at a mix of those at 50% and 60% of <br />—298— MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.