Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CASE # I <br /> <br />REQUEST TO POST DEAD END SIGNS <br />By: Steven Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The City recently received a request for the placement of a dead end sign at the <br />intersection of Nutria Street and 168th Lane. The sign requested was for the south leg of <br />the intersection. It has been past practice to post such signs upon request if the end of the <br />street was not visible from the nearest intersection. Again in practice, staffhas usually <br />posted the requested signs since many of the dead ends are located in areas without street <br />lighting where a dead end which may be visible during the day is not during the evening. <br />In addition, the request itself usually indicates some level of need. <br /> <br />The Committee may recall that the recent posting of a dead end sign at an intersection in <br />the Rivenwick development resulted in a complaint from a resident who objected to the <br />sign being placed in the right of way adjacent to their property. The purpose of this case <br />is to receive direction on whether the current practice in handling requests for dead end <br />signs should be modified. <br /> <br />One possible alternative would be to handle dead end sign requests similar to other traffic <br />signs which are currently handled under the attached Policy Regarding Consideration of <br />Traffic Control Requests. This would require a petition from five or more property <br />owners within 500 feet of the affected intersection and a report from staff. <br /> <br />A second alternative would be to allow staff to continue handling requests for these signs <br />as they have been in the past. Essentially this alternative would assign full discretion to <br />staff for the placement of this particular sign. <br /> <br />A third alternative could be to allow staff to continue to post these signs at their <br />discretion but to report the intention to place a new sign to the Public Works Committee <br />prior to the placement. This would allow at least cursory review by the Committee and <br />would provide advanced knowledge to Councilmember's prior to. a new sign being <br />erected. <br /> <br />Financial Impact: <br /> <br />The cost of installing and placing a dead end sign is approximately $150 per sign which <br />would be charged to the public works street sign budget. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Because a dead end sign is advisory in nature and has no enforcement consequences, <br />subjecting dead end sign requests to the same standards as requests for stop signs seems <br />unnecessarily cumbersome. On the other hand, additional awareness of new signs being <br />