Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Public Hearing - Request for Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site <br />Plan Review of Ramsey Town Center 6th Addition; Case of D.R. Horton, Inc. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt closed the regular portion of the Planning Commission meeting at 8:47 p.m. in <br />order to call the public hearing to order. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 8:47 <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler statedD.R. Horton <br />of Ramsey Town Center 6th Addition in Ma <br />granted an extension of final plat approval unti <br />some revisions to the original plat, thus requiring <br />for the proj ect. The Subj ect Property is west <br />Horton's first phase of townhomes which are immediately <br />approved plan had a total of 77 units (43 ro 'ts and 3 <br />plan also shows 77 units, which will b Ie. The ary reason for the plat <br />revision is to accommodate a change in onstructed <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler indicated the new build' <br />approvea. rowhouse units. Sta <br />middle units within the buildi <br />requirements. Ms. Geisler <br />preliminary site plan of R <br />with City Staff Review Le <br /> <br />different than the previously <br />e minor changes be made to the <br />meet setback and driveway length <br />t the revised preliminary plat and <br />on be approved subject to compliance <br /> <br />n, state . units were platted by R TC a little over two years <br />things have occurred and n.R. Horton has chosen to redesign <br />y started with the redesign they received the public hearing <br />more back to back units. This turned out to work well for <br />the ance in that neighborhood. Mr. Mullenbach stated the new <br />product IS a similar layout to what they have in Block 1 of their fIrst <br />phase. It 11 urban feel to it, with steps up to the front door as opposed to a <br />flat entry in th . There are a couple of items in the staff report to note. D .R. <br />Horton would pre the architecture as it is now, rather than the recommendation that the <br />area on the front of the 'lding be brought out to the front. Currently two of the four units on a <br />typical building include that bump out, and they would like to keep that floor plan. D.R. Horton <br />would also like to continue putting the decks on the back of the homes, as they have done in <br />Block 1. They feel the decks add a lot of relief to the elevation, and many people actively use <br />those decks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy inquired about staffs request for some changes to the elevations. <br /> <br />-194- <br />