My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/07/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/07/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:50:07 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 11:43:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/07/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />the residential area to the north where people may want to no longer use a land line. As staff <br />mentioned, T-Mobile investigated the possibility ofthe water tower land south of this area. That <br />is approximately one mile south of the location they are proposing. Because of the distance <br />between that site, the height, and with the difficulty of getting around the Waste Management <br />mound, that site would not work out and allow coverage to the north. They also looked at the <br />new County tower location proposed to the east, and that was a little too far from the area they <br />are trying to cover. Mr. Edwards presented a map ofT-Mobile current and proposed coverage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if there has been consideration of the fire station site on <br />Armstrong Boulevard. <br /> <br />Mr. Edwards replied that is a T-Mobile site that was approved. It is a replacement site for an <br />existing site that benefits this area to the north, but still does not cover the area of the coverage <br />gap or the hole T-Mobile currently has between Sunfish Lake and Ramsey Boulevards. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked what has been looked at for equipment consolidation on existing sites, <br />and if existing sites have been ruled out as possible solutions. <br /> <br />Mr. Edwards replied that whenever possible, an existing structure is utilized. There is nothing in <br />this general area that would provide coverage other than the Anoka County tower to the east and <br />the water tower to the south, which do not create the coverage they are looking for north of <br />Alpine Park. <br /> <br />Commissioner Trites Rolle asked how far apart the towers are in order to get the coverage T- <br />Mobile wants to achieve. <br /> <br />Mr. Edwards explained that photo streaming, video, and PDA's require a certain amount of <br />bandwidth for each tower, which creates situations where they need more towers or sites in an <br />area. Mr. Edwards stated that with the high number of uses the coverage area actually shrinks <br />down. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cleveland asked what the forecast is for future tower plans. <br /> <br />Mr. Edwards replied it will depend a lot on how the City grows. In the northeast area of the City <br />there is a new water tower in Elk River and a chain of Xcel towers that may be able to be <br />utilized. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer commented that essentially this is an evolving market in which T-Mobile <br />is looking to provide higher broadband service. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer asked how mahy towers it would likely take to cover Ramsey ten years in <br />the future. <br /> <br />Mr. Edwards replied that depends on the number of residents and the uses cell phones will have <br />at that time. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ June 7,2007 <br />Page 4 of31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.