My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 07/10/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2007
>
Minutes - Council - 07/10/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:34:23 PM
Creation date
8/6/2007 2:37:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />driveway would likely be in the range of $1,800 to $3,000. If the City were to consider picking <br />up the portion of 12 foot drive that exists in the City right-of-way, that is from 21 to 15 feet long <br />depending on whether it is a 24 foot wide road in a 66 foot right-of-way, or a 33 foot wide road <br />in a 60 foot right-of-way. The cost would be in the range of $450 to $630 to pave from the edge <br />of the bituminous road up to the right-of-way line. Mr. Olson stated there was discussion <br />relative to what kind of financial commitment the City would be entering into if they were to <br />choose to do this. It was noted that there has not been an inventory completed of all the <br />driveways in the City. They went through the rationale on the case of how they would proceed. <br />There was discussion about problems Coon Rapids has with regard to this type of incentive <br />based program. From what they understand, the City of Coon Rapids offered that one contractor <br />would do all the driveways for the individual property owners, but they were all 100% assessed <br />back to the property owner. The Committee talked at great length about whether they would <br />implement a policy that would require the right-of-way to be paved and give a grace period as to <br />when it would come into effect. There was discussion of an assessment process if the City hired <br />a contractor to go on to private property. Staff was directed to continue to work on a survey of <br />dirt driveways and draft a policy regarding driveway paving for further consideration by the <br />Committee and Council. This will be brought back to a future Public Works Committee <br />meeting, but staff would like input from the Council regarding some of these issues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig indicated that the purpose of this program would be the public good. <br />Typically there is a lot of breakage on the road where the dirt and tarred road meet, and a lot of <br />gravel out onto the tarred road. The concern is people travel on the road with that gravel with <br />bikes and motorcycles, with the gravel getting into the storm sewers, and the degradation of the <br />edge of the roadway. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted it could become a paperwork fiasco if there were to be one assessment for <br />paving work that was done to match up driveways to the street and another assessment for <br />driveways. It is definitely a nice feature to have the driveway paved close to the street, but then <br />it starts breaking up back up on the driveways and it is pushing the problem back another 5 to 15 <br />feet. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated his understanding is that the .discussion was to have the paving <br />potentially pushed back even into the private part of the property. Some of the discussion was <br />how far to push that back. Hopefully pushing it back into the private property it encourages the <br />homeowner at that same time to pull it all the way to their household. Another discussion they <br />had is that this is just problematic on properties that were built some time ago, so they do not <br />have the issue with the new driveways because code requires the blacktopping to be there. This <br />policy is something that is primarily for old driveways. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated it would probably be a problem to go up on private property with paving <br />past the easement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen pointed out that the Coon Rapids program requires paving 50 to 100 feet <br />into the private property. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson explained with the Coon RapIds program the homeowner is <br />responsible for contracting with the contractor. The only thing the City did was offer an <br /> <br />City Council / July 10,2007 <br />Page 18 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.