My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
07/23/07
Ramsey
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
Minutes
>
2000's
>
2007
>
07/23/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2007 9:02:35 AM
Creation date
8/8/2007 9:02:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />POLICY BOARD BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: <br /> <br />Presentation on Comprehensive Storm Water Plan <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson introduced Mr. Bill Douglas and Mr. Todd Javens, <br />representatives from Bolton & Menk, Inc. Environmental Coordinator Anderson <br />reported that Bolton and Menk, Inc. was awarded the contract for the Comprehensive <br />Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) so it can be incorporated in the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan Update. The plan looks at how wetlands, lakes, creeks, ditches, <br />ponds and storm sewer systems interact to convey storm water. A component of their <br />proposal included completing the Wetland Functions and Values study for the 200 plus <br />wetlands that were not ground-truthed by Westwood Professional Services. Bolton and <br />Menk, Inc. has completed the wetland analyses as well as a draft version of the SWMP. <br /> <br />Mr. Douglas stated that Bolton and Menk, Inc. is due to submit the SWMP on <br />Wednesday, July 25, 2007. The City wants a comprehensive model of how the existing <br />system works and recommendations on how to grow without adversely affecting <br />wetlands. They are discovering that Ramsey is built on the Anoka sand plain. Most of <br />the water goes straight down with very little runoff. The concern is to not cause <br />problems downstream when large areas of impervious pavement are added to the <br />landscape. One way to eliminate that is by adding large retention/infiltration basins. Mr. <br />Douglas stated he will be making recommendations to keep the groundwater table close <br />to where it is now, and having the ground filter out rather than dumping into wetlands. <br />Westwood Professional Services completed approximately one-third (1/3) of the wetland <br />ground-truthing. Bolton and Menk, Inc. has now completed the remaining two-thirds <br />(2/3) of wetland ground-truthing. When the final report is completed, they will provide <br />the City with an Access database. <br /> <br />Mr. Javens, Wetland Specialist, stated that Bolton and Menk, Inc. was set to inspect 213 <br />wetlands. They were denied access to six (6) of the 213 wetlands. Of the 213 wetlands, <br />23 were determined to be non-wetlands. They are classified in four (4) different classes. <br />Preserve and Manage 1 are higher quality wetlands with better functions and values. The <br />rest are Manage 2 and 3. By looking at quick readings of tables in the program, two (2) <br />wetlands will move up to the Preserve level. Eleven wetlands will move up to the <br />Manage 1 level. The rest will stay in Manage 2 and 3. A lot of that has to do with <br />existing vegetation such as cattails and reed canary grass. <br /> <br />Mr. Douglas stated that land and water resource information is being put into the SWMP. <br />He noted that the City is already doing things with management of woodlands and <br />forested areas. He asked for clarification whether the City had plans to move forward <br />with a wetland management plan. His intent is to continue on the same theme that <br />Westwood Professional Services started by putting things into GIS so the plan will also <br />be map related. He noted that the City is talking about putting buffers around the <br />wetlands. He will' write into the draft plan that buffers should be required in new <br />developments. The question to be addressed is how to get buffers in previously <br />developed areas so that people aren't mowing to the edge, because that is regarded as a <br />taking. He suggested the City negotiate easements to get the buffers and budget to pay <br /> <br />Environmental Policy Board/July 23, 2007 <br />Page 2 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.