My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/14/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 08/14/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 1:31:18 PM
Creation date
8/10/2007 9:47:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/14/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
476
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
situations that involve vehicles that are left more than a certain number of days the tower <br />would have the right to dispose of the vehicle. <br />Councilmember Dehen suggested implementing a policy that would provide the incentive <br />of not issuing a criminal citation to property owners that pay the abatement fees <br />immediately. <br />Police Chief Way pointed out if a citation were to be issued because the property owner <br />did not pay for the abatement and the City lost in court, the clean -up cost would have <br />already been incurred. <br />Ass't Community Development Dir/HRA Executive Dir. Frolik suggested Council <br />discuss whether there is interest in proceeding with the administrative hearing process. <br />Police Chief Way reported in 2006, 459 calls were taken by staff; 109 were handled by <br />Community Service Officers and 29 citations were issued. Of the 29 citations that were <br />issued, 2 went to court. In 99% of the cases the property is cleaned up after a letter is <br />sent. <br />Councilmember Jeffrey inquired what the reason would be for not proceeding with <br />administrative penalties. <br />Councilmember Dehen stated the administrative process would rapidly remove the <br />problem without dragging it through the court system, which gives unpredictable results. <br />It keeps the process in- house, removes the problem rapidly and helps the property values <br />without lingering neighborhood problems over the years it takes to prosecute. Notice is <br />given and 20 days later the problem is remedied. When a complaint is received in Coon <br />Rapids the code enforcement officer visits the property, and if it is determined there has <br />been a violation she gives notice to the property owner and allows 20 days or the City <br />.will be in charge of the clean -up. If the property owner remedies the situation there is not <br />a charge. He believes Ramsey should take it one step further and allow an initial charge <br />for the code enforcement officer's work. Coon Rapids also has an Excessive <br />Consumption of Service Ordinance that includes progressive costs for properties that <br />need to be continually addressed. <br />City Attorney Goodrich indicated if Council is interested in proceeding with the <br />administrative hearing process staff will come back to Council with options to consider. <br />Councilmember Dehen suggested the ordinance designate one of the City's boards as the <br />administrative hearing officer, rather then a lawyer. <br />Police Chief Way suggested the ordinance be drafted similar to the tobacco ordinance, <br />with either option allowed for situations when the timeline of the designated board does <br />not work well with the process. He indicated the hearing officer would be the City's cost <br />if an individual is successful in their appeal. <br />-196- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.