Laserfiche WebLink
The Committee and staff reviewed the proposed policy regarding lined pond maintenance. The <br />following was discussed in relation to the policy: <br />■ Requirement for a surety in the amount of 125 % of the estimated cost to be held until the <br />last riparian property is constructed; any problem following this would be considered as a <br />public improvement project following the procedure outlined in City Code which <br />requires a feasibility study <br />■ Possibility of property owner concern that the City's method for fixing the problem is too <br />expensive. <br />o It was noted that the policy informs the residents that the City will offer the <br />service of correcting the problem but it will be billed to the adjacent property <br />owners; the repair would be done to the adjacent property owners' satisfaction <br />■ The policy should include a resolution that would be attached to the property deeds to <br />flag the potential cost at the time of sale <br />o There was discussion of whether the resolution should be retroactive to include <br />properties that currently exist adjacent to lined ponds. It was determined that the <br />resolution should not be retroactive; it should include new properties moving <br />forward. Notification letters of the new policy should be sent to all affected <br />property owners. Knowledge of the policy will require notification from existing <br />property owners at the point of sale due to disclosure requirements <br />Motion by Chairperson Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Olson, to recommend to City <br />Council that the Policy on the Construction ion letter of the new y to properts be <br />owners <br />ne ponds and that the City send a notifica t <br />adjacent to existing lined ponds. <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Dehen stated he agrees with the motion, but would like to <br />know legally what effect a letter of notification would have on property owners. Chairperson <br />Elvig replied the letter notifies the residents of the policy and is an attempt to get the information <br />out to them. Public Works Director. Olson pointed out he does not believe the City has ever <br />taken the position that pond liners are the responsibility of the City. This policy clarifies what <br />the City's responsibility will be in the event that a pond goes dry. He expressed concern that the <br />result of a notification will upset residents while there is nothing that needs to be fixed at this <br />time. Chairperson Elvig stated making people aware there is a policy in place is good <br />communication and the notification letter would be proactive. The City Attorney can provide a <br />legal opinion when the policy is considered by the City Council. Councilmember Olson inquired <br />about the age of the oldest pond liner in the City. City Engineer Jankowski replied Juniper Ridge <br />is the oldest and was built in about 1992. It is a clay material, not a synthetic liner; he would not <br />expect it to fail unless someone were to dig around in it. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Elvig, Councilmembers Olson and Dehen. Voting <br />No: None. <br />Case #5: Consider Adopting Ordinance Requiring Dedication of the Vision Triangle <br />in City Right -of -Way <br />Public Works Committee / June 19, 2007 <br />—262— Page 8 of 12 <br />