My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1996 CAFR
Ramsey
>
Finance
>
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
>
1996
>
1996 CAFR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2007 3:01:01 PM
Creation date
8/13/2007 2:09:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Finance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF RA11'ISEY, MINNESOTA <br />NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS <br />December 31,1996 <br />Note 7 <br />TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REVENUE NOTES <br />The City entered into several private development agreements during 1991 and 1996. Contemplated in the <br />development agreements were the reimbursements to each of the developers for special trunk assessments. The <br />vehicle used for this reimbursement is called a tax increment revenue note. The original assessments are as <br />follows: <br />Chestnut Hills <br />Cedar Hills <br />Windemere Woods <br />Energy Park Second Addition #1 <br />Energy Park Second Addition #2 <br />Total <br />205,300 <br />234,042 <br />106,756 <br />455,855 <br />56,628 <br />$ 1,058,581 <br />During 1991, the City entered into private development agreements for Chestnut Hills, Cedar Hills, and <br />Windemere Woods. The City agreed to reimburse the developers through future potential tax increments <br />received from these developments. These notes provide for the payment of principal and interest (8%) up to the <br />lessor of the note or 97% of available tax increment from these developments. The notes began accruing interest <br />on December 1, 1993, with the first payment due to the developers on February 1, 1995, for tax increments <br />received during 1994. The last payment will be February 1, 2000, based on increments received during 1999. <br />Each developer receives only the increments generated by their subdivision. Payments from available increments <br />are applied first to accrued interest and then to principal balances. If increments received through the year 1999 <br />are not sufficient to pay off each developer, the note will be cancelled. Excess increments, if any, received after <br />1999, will be retained by the City. <br />During 1996, the City entered into two private development agreements for the Energy Park Second Addition. <br />The City agreed to reimburse the developers through future potential tax increments received from this <br />development. Per the agreement document, the City will pay on each scheduled payment date up to the lessor of <br />the net tax increment collected from this development or the scheduled payment due (with interest included in the <br />payment of 8%). The first note begins accruing interest on January 1, 1998, with the first payment due to the <br />developers on December 15, 1998, and the second note on January 1, 2003, with the first payment due to the <br />developers on December 15, 2003, respectively. For both agreements, the final payments will be December 15, <br />2005, for tax increments received during 2005. Payments from availa'le increments are applied first to accrued <br />interest and then to principal balances. Any excess increments received after 2005 will be retained by the City. <br />Included in current liabilities for the year ended December 31, 1996 is $197,157, which represents the portion of <br />increments collected in 1996 that were payable to the developers on February 1, 1997. These payments are <br />recorded as capital outlay as they represent a payment for trunk infrastructure contributed by the developers. <br />The outstanding principal balance as of December 31, 1996 for all of these agreements was $692,839. .This <br />amount is not included in long-term debt because of the nature of these notes in that repayment is required only if <br />sufficient tax increments are received. The City's position is that these are obligations to assign future and <br />uncertain revenue sources and as such, have not been included in long-term debt. <br />-23- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.