Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA <br />NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) <br />December 31, 1989 <br />Note 9. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE (continued) <br />The pension benefit obligations as of June 30, 1989, are shown below: <br />PERF PEPFF <br />(in Thousands) <br />Total pension $ 3.714.2 5 7 $ 5 8 2.2 9 9 <br />benefit obligation <br />Net assets available <br />for benefits, at cost <br />(market values for <br />PERF $3,801,129; <br />PEPFF = $694,227) 2.934.977 637.868 <br />Unfunded (assets in <br />excess of) pension <br />benefit obligation $779,280 $(55,5.69) <br />The measurement of the pension benefit obligation is based on an actuarial <br />valuation as of June 30, 1989. Net assets available to pay pension <br />benefits were valued as on June 30, 1989. <br />2. Changes in Actuarial Methods and Benefit Provisions <br />A number of benefit improvements became effective during fiscal year <br />1989. Some of the major improvements affecting each fund include a <br />reduction in the period required for vesting from five years to three <br />years; an option for members hired before July 1, 1989, to have their <br />annuity calculated under a level benefit accrual formula; the interest rate <br />credited on refunds of member contributions increased from 5% to 6%; <br />and the provision for an automatic bounce back feature for all joint and <br />survivor annuity options. In the PEPFF, age and/or service requirements <br />were reduced for eligibility for a normal retirement annuity, an early <br />retirement annuity, and for certain disability and survivor benefits. <br />For each fund, there were changes in the actuarial assumptions used in <br />the annual actuarial valuation. Effective for all funds beginning in fiscal <br />year 1989, the pre-retirement interest rate assumption was increased <br />from 8.0% to 8.5%. Additionally, for the PERF and the PEPFF, the <br />amortization target date has been changed to 2020. Shown on the <br />following page are the effects on the pension benefit obligation of these <br />changes in plan benefits and actuarial assumptions. <br />-3=- <br />