Laserfiche WebLink
<br />set and impacting their future values of their property. He noted he has a document that Mr. James <br />in 1986 donated the property and is not tied directly into his title so he did not know if that was <br />actually done but it was notarized, signed and accepted by the City of Ramsey. <br /> <br />Mr. Chad Wiech, stated he is the fee owner of the property and there are no encumbrances on this <br />property. He noted he has a copy of his Title Insurance, Schedule A and B for the City. He noted <br />when he did his research and paid his attorney and paid for a title insurance policy of the same, there <br />was no indication and there is no title encumbrance on the property that would preclude it from <br />being used as a residential lot. He stated the one diffic c e to the City was because the <br />surrounding properties are all 2.5 acres and the concerns 0 e and his objective is to not <br />give up his rights if he had them either and he is e away anything from his <br />neighbors. The difficulty for him and everyone em to get a sewer line in <br />there is very prohibitive. He indicated he wo ok up to City <br />sewer and water when available. He stated he e stated the <br />owner of Alpaca Estates sold him a lot along wit a certificate of <br />Title. He noted he also has an extensive UL T A ith other s s and reports and <br />does have clear fee title to it. He stated before him partnership has paid taxes for <br />this property for a number of years. <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Eugene H. Leonhardt, 8005 142nd Av <br />to defend themselves for a property th <br />those rights they claim to have that lot <br />a charade for other purposes. There is <br />he thought that was the reason fI is. <br />the door for a different type opment <br />Board to take this into consi hen revi <br /> <br />they cou get counsel quick enough <br />em some time ago. He stated under <br />em. He felt this whole thing is <br />develop~ble at 1 \!z acre lots and <br />allows this variance, they will open <br />eir property. He would like for the <br />lication. <br /> <br />e, stated he wanted to talk about the valuation of their 2.5 <br />ut in 1.5 acre lots in the area. He thought it will devalue <br />ld go and look at this lot because it is low land and <br /> <br />'f there was any indication of where the ordinary high water line <br /> <br />is a flood elevation for the Mississippi River and anything that <br />least one foot above that. <br /> <br />Chairperson a <br />proposed to build <br /> <br />'ered what the elevation was from the flood elevation to where it is <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated the highest elevation showing on the plan is 856.1. She noted there <br />is a six foot difference between the lowest and highest elevation on the property. <br /> <br />Chairperson Van Scoy wondered what the high water line represents. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment! August 2, 2007 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br />-181- <br /> <br />