Laserfiche WebLink
<br />south line of said section for a distance of 209 feet thence proceed south and <br />parallel to west line of said section for a distance of 209 feet, thence proceed <br />west and parallel to first course to the west line of said section thence proceed <br />north along west line of said section to point of commencement, Section 27, <br />Township 32, Range 25, except road subject to easement of record. <br /> <br />(The 'Subject Property') <br /> <br />4. That the total area of the property to be rezoned B-1 Business is approximately 1.8 acres. <br /> <br />5. That the proposed rezoning is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) <br />boundary. <br /> <br />6. That the Subject Property is currently zone~ E-l Employment. <br /> <br />7. That the surrounding adjacent properties are zoned E-l Employment and R-l Single Family <br />Residential. <br /> <br />8. That the site is currently vacant. <br /> <br />9. That the development site will ultimately include three commercial/retail buildings. <br /> <br />10. That the proposed development will not exercise substantial detrimental influence on the <br />market value of surrounding properties. <br /> <br />11. That the proposed development will be compatible with surrounding land uses. <br /> <br />12. That the proposed development will not impose undue burden on public services and <br />facilities, including fire and police protection, schools, streets, water systems, sanitary <br />sewer systems and storm sewer systems. <br /> <br />13. That the proposed development is designed in such a way as to form a desirable and unified <br />environment within its own boundaries, and also will not be detrimental to future laud uses <br />in the surrounding areas. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY FINDS THE FOLLOWING: <br /> <br />a) That the action to rezone the Subject Property from E-l Employment to B-1 <br />Business is acceptable. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />. , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />-280- <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #07-09-_ <br />Page 2 of3 <br />