Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Umland asked if there will be a fence allthe way around the turn around. <br /> <br />The applicant stated his intention would be to put the fence on the inside of the cul-de-sac for <br />security reasons and run it back up to the north property line and keep it far enough away to allow <br />for snow storage. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated the City would request 7-10 feet for adequate snow storage along <br />the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />The applicant did not believe that would be an issue. He suggested adequate landscaping be placed <br />along the cul-de-sac but the question is who would maintain that and he thought it should be the <br />adjoining property owners because it will be outside of the boundaries of his property. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated the cul-de-sac is being dedicated as a public cul-de-sac so any <br />landscaping placed within the right-of-way will be the City's responsibility to maintain so they <br />would need to look at the landscaping to see what would be the best kind to maintain. He suggested <br />some type of ornamental trees. <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Nixt, seconded by Board Member Cleveland, to close the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Van Scoy, Board Members Nixt, Cleveland, Brauer, <br />Hunt, and Trites Rolle. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Levine. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 8:46 p.m. <br /> <br />Board Business <br /> <br />Chairperson Van Scoy called the Board of Adjustment meeting back to order at 8:46 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Nixt, seconded byBoard Member Trites Rolle, to adopt Resolution #07- <br />08-180 adopting Findings of Fact #0803 relating to a request for a 30 foot variance to the 60 foot <br />buffer on the north property line and a variance to the 20 foot pavement setback at the cul-de-sac on <br />148th Avenue NW, with the variables favorable to the applicants request. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: <br /> <br />Board Member Nixt clarified that the motion does not include a 5 foot variance to the 60 foot buffer <br />on the east property line. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Van Scoy, Board Members Nixt, Trites Rolle, Brauer, <br />Cleveland, and Hunt. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Levine. <br /> <br />Motion by Board Member Nixt, seconded by Board Member Trites Rolle, to approve the request for <br />a variance to bufferyard and pavement setback requirements and adopting Resolution #07-08-181 <br />declaring terms of same. . <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/August 2, 2007 <br />Page 11 of 12 <br />