My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/04/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/04/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:42:15 AM
Creation date
9/28/2007 8:06:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/04/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mayor Gamec pointed out that there are two other properties that would be assessed. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich indicated it cannot be said that this amount would be a benefit to all of <br />the properties. It would seem that would be close to a wash. <br /> <br />Mr. Jenson questioned if the applicant would not be able to go forward with the project until <br />such time as the eminent domain proceedings and the construction to 146tb is completed. He <br />questioned if the applicant "would be able to receive a Certificate of Occupancy before 146th <br />comes in. He indicated if not, they will have plenty of time in terms of accepting a denial and <br />proceeding with whether to put a complex on that property with the access, recouping their cost <br />and saving the balance of the property for future development. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich indicated the time concern can be explored. <br /> <br />Mr. Jenson asked when the next City Council meeting will be held that this application would be <br />addressed. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich indicated the next thing to happen is that staff, Mr. Boe, Mr. Jenson and <br />he could get together and discuss what Council has discussed and the issues Mr. Jenson has' <br />, raised, and to come to a better idea regarding the costs and the feasibility of assessing those <br />costs. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson stated staff is not aware of where the buildings are located on the <br />property to the north, which will significantly impact the cost of the right-of-way. He requested <br />clarification as to whether it is being said that the cost for the construction of the roadway will be <br />assessed to the north two adjacent properties. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich indicated they willloo\<. at all options and attempt to assess the cost of <br />the project to any benefiting properties. " <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec suggested Mr. Boe work with his attorney and staff, and if he does not feel it is <br />satisfactory or is not happy with the timing he could request that the plat is denied in order to <br />proceed with the current access. They know the applicant has other alternatives for a couple of <br />accesses, and he would rather not see that. <br /> <br />Mr. Jenson stated they do not want to go down that route, but economics are economics. His <br />understanding is that the 60-day rule is out there until October 15th. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated the applicant has been very patient and they will try to move this along. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich indicated City Counqil meetings are held every two weeks and the <br />Council is willing to hold a special meeting if necessary. <br /> <br />Mr. Jenson stated they respectfully request that this application be tabled. <br /> <br />City Council / August 14, 2007, <br />Page l6 of 32 <br /> <br />P32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.