Resolution - #07-09-210 - 09/06/2007

Home

9. That the need for a reduced cul-de-sac size was created by the compromise on site access reached by the Developer, City, and Anoka County during prior plan approvals granted in 2004. 10. That no access to the site itself will be available through the cul-de-sac. 11. That the cul-de-sac is expected to accommodate very little traffic, mostly for turnaround purposes. 12. That currently the 148th Avenue terminus is a dead end, unable to accommodate turnaround traffic. 13. That the variance requested is the minimum variance needed to alleviate the hardship. 14. That if granted, the variance will not permit a use that is prohibited in the E-l Employment District. ' 15. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property . 16. That if granted, the variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Chapter or other property in the same zone. 17. That if granted, the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. 18. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably diminish property values in the neighborhood. 19. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably increase congestion in the public streets. 20. That if granted, the variance will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 21. That, if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privileges that are denied to other owners of land in the same district. . 22. That undue hardship will result if the variance request is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land and which are not applicable to other lands in the same district. 23. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. RESOLUTION #07-09-210 Page 2 of3