My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 06/10/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2003
>
Minutes - Council - 06/10/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 4:06:09 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 1:45:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmen{ber!Pearson expressed concern with how close the units are to the road. He inquired <br /> I <br />how they md~asute the 30-foot setback when there is a slope. <br /> <br />Brian Johns~ <br />that the 30,t <br />The net den <br />Acres and 2~ <br />the wetlands <br /> <br />~n, Hakanson Anderson, explained that the setback is measured horizontal. He felt <br />%t isetback would allow for them to plant the landscaping to show a good project. <br />ity!does exclude the wetlands. They have 42.4 acres with the combined Alpine <br />A~dition, and they are proposing 208 units, which would be 4.9 units per acre with <br />included. When they take out the wetlands they are at 6.3 units per acre and the <br /> <br />ordinance alr~)wl for up to 7 units per acre. Within the development, they are proposing 8-foot <br />trails surroUflrding the development and there will be five foot sidewalks along the public streets. <br /> <br />Councilmember iKurak stated that she was concerned about the density, how the buildings are <br />positioned aad hpw close they are to the road. There is one situation along Alpine Drive where <br />there is no bhffe~ between the end of the cul-de-sac and Alpine Drive. She recommended that a <br />fence be Con~trubted in that location to provide privacy for the new units as well as the people <br />who live acrt~ss ~e street. <br /> <br />Councilrnem~er Cook stated that he would prefer to see some sort of plantings rather than a <br />fence. <br /> <br />Councilmember iKurak replied that she did not believe that plants would provide adequate <br />screening. .~he istated that she would like to see the City require privacy fences along all <br />roadways an~ adjoining property owners. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if the developer was proposing a substantial amount of screening <br />along C.R. #~. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson ~epl.ied yes. <br />Councilmem~per Elvig stated that he thought they were presenting a fairly decent project that <br />needs some akJju~tment and apologized for all of the comments being negative· He stated that he <br />would like tl/e ol~portumty to s~t down in a work sessmn to work things out and allow for some <br />more d~scussmn. <br /> <br />Mayor Game~ stated that he would rather see trees rather than fencing because he does not want <br />to "box off' t.he development. He felt that the area should have a residential feeling. <br /> <br />Mayor GamUt s~ated that he thought the main issue was density. He recommended either <br />reducing the ~umber of units or changing the layout. He stated that he would agree that the cul- <br />de-sac lengt~ shguld be reduced so that there is a buffer between the cul-de-sac and Alpine <br />Drive. <br /> <br />Councilmeml3er Kurak inquired as to the price range of the units. <br /> <br />City Council/June 10, 2003 <br />Page 12 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.