My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 06/24/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2003
>
Minutes - Council - 06/24/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 4:07:34 PM
Creation date
6/26/2003 1:46:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/24/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CouncilmeffiberlCook noted that within a few months they would have a development agreement <br />for the Towr~ Ceta. ter that identifies what will be included on the site. <br /> <br />Mr. Uecker ~tat ~e,d that people lose their jobs in this economy so to have an attitude that a City <br />employee cag't l.~se their job was not right. <br /> <br />Mr. Parry inquired as to what the utility companies will be making off the franchise fee. <br /> <br />Finance OffiCer ,Lurid explained that the utility companies do not receive an administration fee <br />for collectin§th~ franchise fee. The City receives the entire 4.5 percent. <br /> <br />Mr. Hendri~sen; CenterPoint Energy, Minnegasco, explained that the original franchise <br />agreement wlth the City of Ramsey was done in 1984, and it was outdated and it was due to <br />expire in 20~9. i When they talked to the City, they stated that they would entertain a new <br />franchise, which iis what was addressed in the previous case. The franchise agreement permits <br />the City to c~arg~ a franchise fee according to State Statute and then they are required to pass that <br />onto the user~, which is then given back directly to the City. <br /> <br />Eric Zaetch, !54th Avenue NW, Ramsey, stated that the City's consultants can go as a way to cut <br />the budget stroh ~ The Tinklenberg Group and the McCombs Group. In addition, the City is <br />talking about[3 ~illion dollars for a private development, and questioned why. He stated that the <br />City should tull ~e Town Center developers to pay for their own roads. The City of Andover <br />was faced wilh tlte same question and they had the courage to say no. The City should not add <br />the franchise fees: <br /> <br />Jim Gromberg, C. onnexus Energy, stated that franchise fees are a pass through for them to the <br />customers and it Will appear as a line item on their bill. It is a decision that has to be made by the <br />City. <br /> <br />Finance Offi~[er Lund inquired as to how many cities have contacted them regarding franchise <br />fee. <br /> <br />Mr. Grornber~ explained that they have been contacted by the cities of Andover, Anoka, Ramsey, <br />and Champlin!. <br /> <br />Councilmemb~r Cook inquired as to how many cities had contacted CenterPoint Energy. <br /> <br />Mr. Hendriks~n explained that they currently have six cities out of their 200 franchise cities that <br />charge a franchis{ fee, but they have had 37 cities that have recently requested information since <br />the State redu{ed local government aid. <br /> <br />Mr. Enstrom ~tat~ that the City needs money and the City feels there is no more ways to make <br />cuts, but one bf the ways the City could have saved money was to not spend time on putting <br />together ~nformat~0n regarding franchise fees. <br /> <br />City Council/June 24, 2003 <br />Page 14 of 37 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.