My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 10/09/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2007
>
Minutes - Council - 10/09/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:35:52 PM
Creation date
10/25/2007 9:33:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/09/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Motion carried. V oting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Dehen, Olson, Elvig, Jeffrey, <br />. Look, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Adopt Ordinance to Rezone Property from E-l Employment to B...l Business; <br />Case of TSM Development, Inc. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated that this item is for the same project as Case #3, but a different <br />portion of the site. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Jeffrey, to adopt Ordinance #07- <br />16 to rezone the Subject Property from E-1 Employment to B-1 Business, contingent upon <br />Metropolitan Council approval of the applicant's Comprehensive Plan Amendment and final plat <br />approval. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed by Mayor Gamec. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec: aye <br />Councilmember Dehen: aye <br />Councilmember Elvig: aye <br />Councilmember Jeffrey: aye <br />Councilmember Look: aye <br />Councilmember Olson: aye <br />Councilmember Strommen: aye <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Case #5: <br /> <br />Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Case of Dan Murphy and Tim <br />Holm <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler noted that Dan Murphy and Tim Holm have applied to rezone this <br />property from B-2 Business to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). She stated that they would <br />like to put in six twin home units. She noted that the Planning Commission reviewed this plan at <br />their September 7, 2006 meeting and recommended denial. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that if the zoning remains as is, a commercial business could come <br />and clear out all the trees so there would be no buffer for the residential area. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated that there would be a buffer required even if this was developed <br />comniercially. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that he has not been in favor of this change from the beginning and <br />feels residents would rather see businesses on this land than town homes. He stated that he does <br />not see a compelling reason to cram three buildings onto this lot and change the comprehensive <br />plan. He stated that he received the message during his campaign that people do not want <br />anymore town homes in the City. <br /> <br />City Council /October 9, 2007 <br />Page 8 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.