My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/01/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/01/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:42:22 AM
Creation date
10/26/2007 3:05:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/01/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CASE # 3 <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING . <br />REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM B;.2 BUSINESS <br />. TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; <br />CASE OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY <br />By: Amy Geisler, AICP, Interim Assistant Com. Dev. Director <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission will recall that back in 2006, Dan Murphy and Tim Holm applied for <br />a Zoning Amendment related, to the plat of Ebony Woods. On September 7, 2006 the Planning <br />Commission reviewed the request to rezone the property from B-2 Business to Planned Unit <br />Development, and recommended denial. On October 9,2007 the City Council denied the zoning <br />amendment request, and directed Staff to' initiate a new zoning amendment to change the <br />property's zoning designation from B-2 Business to R-l Residential. <br /> <br />The fol~owing items are ~nclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) Site Location Map <br />b) Proposed Findings of Fact <br />c) Proposed Ordinance <br />*City Council meeting minutes are included with ~he Comp P [an Amendment case * <br /> <br />Notification: <br /> <br />Property owners within 700 feet w~re notified of the public hearing. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The City Council had a lengthy discussion about the appropriateness of developing the Subject <br />Property with twinhomes. Ultimately, they determined thatit was not an appropriate use given <br />. the adjacent single-family homes. They did feel that the property's current zoning designation of <br />B-2 Bl,1siness was not appropriate either, however, and directed Staff to conduct a public hearing <br />on whether it should be changed to R-l Residential. <br /> <br />The property is bordered on the north by the Superbowl building, on the west by mini-storage <br />. units and single- family homes, on the south by a single-family home under construction, and on <br />the east by single-family homes. <br /> <br />There is no subdivision proposal before the City at this time; if the Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment and rezoning are approved, a subdivision would still need to be approved before any <br />new homes could be built on the property. <br /> <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.