My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
03/26/96
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Agendas
>
1990's
>
1996
>
03/26/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2025 12:11:11 PM
Creation date
7/1/2003 1:35:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Finance Committee
Document Date
03/26/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AWARD BID FOR PURCHASE OF ARTICULATED LOADER WITH <br />SNOW PLOW AND WING <br /> By: Jessie Hart, Finance Officer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Council previously authorized requesting bids for a 4-wheel drive loader with snow plow and <br />wing. We received two bids that were opened on Friday, March 15, 1996. St. Joseph's <br />Equipment, Inc. [Shakopee] bid a CASE Model 721B. RDO Equipment Co. bid a John Deere <br />Model 624G. Both bidders met all of the minimum requirements set out in the bid documents. <br /> <br />We bid four options, all of which included provisions to trade in the current 1980 Fiat-Allis <br />loader. The attributed trade-in value is $28,000 by the CASE dealer and $16,000 by the John <br />Deere dealer. The various alternatives in the bids were net of trade value. Two of the four <br />options were for five year leases of either a new piece of equipment or one which was slightly <br />used. We wished to be able to evaluate whether there might be cost savings potential through the <br />lease option. <br /> <br />The annual cost of the lease by the CASE dealer would save use between $128 and $884/year in <br />carrying costs. The John Deere lease option was actually more costly than the ownership <br />options. A consideration in the lease option is the loss of flexibility and the lack of any equity in <br />an asset. We do not believe the cost savings in the CASE machine warrants pursuing that option. <br /> <br />The ownership options are: <br /> <br />DEALER <br /> <br />BRAND NEW MACHINE USED MACHINE <br /> <br />RDO Equipment Co. <br />St. Joseph's Equipment <br /> <br />John Deere $123,575 $107,555 <br />CASE $102,545 $ 91,980 <br /> <br />In both cases [new and used] we requested a guaranteed buy-back option after we have owned <br />the machine for five years. The buy-back guarantee is greater with the John Deere but it is not <br />great enough to make up for the increased cost of their machine and the lower trade in value. <br />With either purchase we will retain the option to consider exercising the opportunity to trade the <br />machine after five years or keep it for the entire life of the machine. It appears at this point that <br />the annual cost of ownership of either machine is slightly less exercising that option, but it is <br />expected that the cost of new machines five years from now will eat up any potential savings. <br /> <br />The Public Works Supervisor has looked at all four machines within the bid options. His <br />recommendation is that the used machines [with about 200 hours on the meter] look and operate <br />just like new and will meet our needs. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.