My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/04/1996 - Budget Public Hearing
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1996
>
Minutes - Council - 12/04/1996 - Budget Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 4:02:16 PM
Creation date
7/2/2003 2:46:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Budget Public Hearing
Document Date
12/04/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING <br />CITY OF RAMSEY <br /> ANOKA COUNTY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />The City of Ramsey conducted its Budget Public Hearing on Wednesday, December 4, 1996, at <br />the Ramsey Municipal Center, 15153 Nowthen Boulevard NW, Ramsey, Minnesota. <br /> <br />Members Present <br /> <br />Mayor Glen Hardin <br />Councilmember Carolyn Beahen <br />Councilmember Sheila Beyer <br />Councilmember Kenneth Peterson <br />Councilmember Gerald Zimmerman <br /> <br />Also Present: <br /> <br />City Administrator Ryan Schroeder <br />Finance Officer Jessie Hart <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin called the Budget Public Hearing to order at 7:03 p.m. He explained this is the <br />Troth in Taxation public hearing which is designed to give residents the opportunity to ask about <br />the City's budget. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Hart explained that if any resident has a question about property assessed value, <br />they should be directed to the County Assessor's office. This meeting deals only with the City's <br />budget. She noted handout materials - Proposed 1997 General Fund Budget In Brief and the <br />Public Hearing Informational Packet. The informational packet contained the basic concepts of <br />City budgeting, how the tax dollar is divided (School District, County, Other, and the City), how <br />property taxes are determined, property classification rates, tax capacity rates based on proposed <br />levies, comparison of standard residential service charges for the City, Local Government Aid, <br />Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid, the Fiscal Disparities Program, and a Tax Capacity <br />comparison with other Metro Area cities with similar populations. Ms. Hart summarized each of <br />these. She explained that the General Fund Budget was prepared based on no tax rate increase for <br />payable 1997. In preparing the 1997 Proposed General Fund Budget, the following objectives <br />were established: a) recognize the limitations placed on City activities resulting from limited <br />revenue growth; and b) maintain or increase the existing level of City services and programs; and <br />c) maintain the tax capacity rate at a level consistent with the 1996 rate yet adequate enough to <br />provide for ongoing services and programs while continuing taxing levels comparable to or below <br />that of surrounding communities; and d) position the City financially such that stable revenues are <br />identified for current and future capital programming and equipment replacement; and e) avoid <br />deferring costs to future years. She briefly summarized the revenues and expenditures. <br /> <br />The public hearing opened at 7:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Larry Wyrum, 7929 - 157th Avenue NW, Ramsey, stated that staff is talking about a zero tax <br />increase. He exclaimed that his part of the City's tax went up 32%. He stated he has not had a <br />raise in the last six years and yet everything continues to increase. He asked what the City is doing <br />with the money. The Finance Officer went through this whole budget, step by step, and he could <br />not recall any of it. A resident does not know what a professional Finance Officer knows. He felt <br />that it should not be presented as a zero increase when in fact there is a large increase. <br /> <br />Ms. Hart responded that as this pertains to value, if there was no value increase, based on this <br />proposal, you would have seen no tax increase. The City does not have control over value <br />Increases. <br /> <br />Budget Public Hearing/December 4, 1996 <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.