05/01/78 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

'~- ~ ~~ P & Z ~l- i 5/117 PLA~N-~.~G ~ ZONING Cou~2~ of Anoka Stat~ ~f Minnesota A re;?u]ar meeting of the Ra~s.~y City Planning & Zoning Commission wss held on M~y l, 1978 at ~amsSy ~Cmty Hall, 15155 Nowthen Boulevard. Meet~n~ w~3s called to order.~by Chairman Ken Peterson at 7:50 p.m. wi~h t~e fo]~ ].ow~n~~. i~ a~tendance~' ~[ KeDneth Peterson Ro~a~d West Also Present: A] SorteberF Bradley Bodle Peter Raa~ikka~ C~_%y Eng. Ks~hy Scb-~eider Ar~ Sunn I~_?n 1_.~ P~blic, Hearing .- T~a~k' Commons. Cbai~,~an ~[~ Peter~~2~[the~-e~~ exolaining the reasons for a Public Hear~_ng and asked ~o~ any citizen input. Mr. De]ano Skiem was presen~ ~o explain the restrictive covenants and ex- D]aina~ that since it his i~t~ntions to locate within the plat, these coven~r~s should keep the p~a~ aesthetically attractive. l,ir~]a An~.rus~ 15520 Vario!i~eN.W..asked if the accessory buildings be ]oc~te~ alon[f the rear o~ ~he lots~ and if so~ this would not make a vary a~,t~active, view along ~a~iolite Street. Ivan Fields, 7605 156th N.W~ ,. asked about the minimum acreage req~irement for horses and ew-olaine~ th~t~he was concerned with horse odor and i-he idea of horses in the park hr~a. Mr. Fields also asked about construction -~i~t~r and Mr. S~iem s~ated~t~at: anY'complaints should be directed ~o him L~n~a Andrus i~quir~d what ~l~.ns were being made for the park, and Skio,~ ewr>].aJned that this v~lid be a City responsibility. Kan Peterson asked for addi~'enal questmons and exolamned that any ~.nDut or questions re,carding the ~a~k ].and c[ould be directed to the Parks &~ec. Corms'issUeD as ha was sure ~e~ would appreciate any citizen inout. Ken Petersor~ asked Pete Ra~%ikka ~o go over his report. In response to t~ha 700 foot dead end ques~.on ~2, a cul-de-sac would be provided. The resubdivJsion Dian was bro~h~ uo: for discussion. %n.-res~ard2 to the ~ivan already. The consen~s~ of the Commisoion wao that in the eve~%t of resubdivis~on: an easement ~co~ld be ~iven by t~e oresent owner at t}'~at time. Po~e [~aatikka pointed out ~sv~rs_].~ areas where the resubomvmsmon plan needed rowor~'inf~. Del ,~kmem expl~npd that. the whole conceot of resubdivision is reara ~,m. a "what if" g~e~ but that ~th,~ plan could be ' In discuss-~ng the park lan~ b~ing dedica.ted~ Mr. Skiem stated that the Ps.?~ Cnm~,ulss~[on already ag~ee~. 2o accept the land in lieu of money even though the hand. was only 5 ~ac~es instead of 8% or 6.42 acres as required by or~insnce. Kathy Schne~de~ Pointed out that due to the fact the land h~d been reduced ~)own to 4.35.~ acres~ the Park Commission should have an opDortu~Jty to reewamine tie bffer. Kathy Schneider explained to Skiem that in other cases ,h~2 the land did not meet the ordinance re- quirements~ developers off~r~ cash along with the land to make up the difference. Mr. Skiem did no'~ seem %o feel this should_ be necesssrv~ but it wa~ agreed by the Co~mz~si~n members that a~ a~reement on this s?,ould