Resolution - #93-06-118 - 06/22/1993

Home

10 I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I Counc. Zimmerman introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #93-06-118 A RESOI~U'~ION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT #0337 TO REZONE CERTAIN'iPI~OPERTY· ~ · FROM B-1 BUSINESS TO R-1 URBAN RESIDENTIAL wHeReAS, Arthur Raudio and Elizabeth Raudio, Ramsey Center Limited Partnership and R.F. D~veiOpment, hereinafter referred to as "Applicants", have properly applied for a rezoning ~ ce~in parcels in River's Bend 3rd Addition from B-1 Business to R-1 Urban Residential;.' hnd N~ 'I~HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Ol~ ~Pg~}IIdSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That~thelrApplicants appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission for a public hea~ g Oursuant to Section 9.03.03 of the Ramsey City Code on June 1, 1993 and that said btibltc hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are herel~y hicorporated by reference. 2. That ~e Vroperty proposed to be rezoned from B-1 Business to R-1 Urban Residential is lega~!y~ ~bed as follows: Lots i through 17, Block 1; Outlet F; RIVER'S BEND 3RD ADDITION, Anoka County, 3. That ~e subject property is currently zoned B-1 Business. 4. That bn September 16, 1991, the subject property was subjected to a public hearing by the Ram~y l~lanning and Zoning Commission to consider rezoning the property to allow for dev~!~p~ent of the property with single and multi-family units in addition to the co~rcial zoning already existing on the property. 5. That Ihe ~,¢zoning proposal considered in 1991, particularly the multi-family zoning, met with/~dpp0s' ifion from area residents. 6. That 0n january 19, 1993, the Applicants submitted a revised preliminary plat for the subj~ property that eliminated the proposal for multi-family density development. 7. That. the SUbject property now being considered for rezoning is bounded on the west by Hwy, #10, on the north by R-3 Urban Residential zoning, on the east by R-1 Urban Resi& infi~ development and on the south by B- 1 Business development. 8. That tle Pipplicants' proposal to develop the plat with a combination of single family urban reside] ttia~and commercial uses has received implied approval by the City Council granting final 10 at approval to the subject property on May 25, 1993. 9. Thal~ flae Proposed zoning amendment will not substantially adversely impair the use or marke~ val~e of any surrounding property. 10. That ~e ~oposed zoning amendment will not be harmonious with the objectives of the Comi~hensive Plan. 11. That th~ proposed zoning amendment will not change the essential character of the area.