Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Bauer introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #16-01-007 <br />RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT #0959 RELATING TO A REQUEST <br />FOR A VARIANCE TO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR AN <br />EXISTING DECK. <br />WHEREAS, Central Bank, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," has properly applied for <br />a variance from Section 117-148 (Critical River Overlay District Development Standards) of the <br />Ramsey City Code regarding the minimum required side yard setback for an existing deck on the <br />property generally known as 14500 Bowers Drive NW and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 27, Bowers Mississippi Acres, Anoka County, Minnesota <br />(the "Subject Property"). <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1. That the Applicant appeared before the Planning Commission for a public hearing pursuant <br />to Section 117-53 (Variances) of the Ramsey City Code on January 7, 2016, and that said <br />public hearing was properly advertised, and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby <br />incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. <br />2. That the Subject Property is zoned R-1 Residential (MUSA) and is approximately 1.08 acres <br />in size. <br />3. That the Subject Property is surrounded by properties also zoned R-1 Residential (MUSA) <br />and of similar sizes. <br />4. That the Subject Property is located within the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area and <br />the Rural Service Area as defined in MN Statutes. <br />5. That Section 117-148 (Critical River Overlay District Development Standards) of City Code <br />establishes a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres for lots within the Critical River Area and Rural <br />Service Area. <br />6. That the Subject Property was platted in 1948 as part of the Bowers Mississippi Acres plat <br />and is considered lawful non -conforming with regard to lot size and lot width. <br />7. That the home on the Subject Property appears to have been constructed in 1970 based on <br />information within the property file. <br />8. That there is no Building Permit in the property file for the deck on the Subject Property; <br />however, based on assessment information in the property file, there is record of a deck on <br />the Subject Property dating back to at least 1981. <br />