|
; lP& Z
<br /> ~ : 12/19/?$
<br />
<br /> P~.a~ninF, & Zoning
<br /> ,~itY of Rar~Sey
<br /> C~unty of ~noka
<br /> St?he of Minnesota
<br />
<br />A ~;nac-i~ meeting o¢ the aRa~sey. City Plannin~ & zoning co~nmission was
<br />hr?] ¢~ on December 1~ 197~ a.~ ~amsey City MunicSpal Center, 15153 Pio~trthen
<br />Blvd. I'f.W. Meetinf~ was ~a!!ed to order by Chairman Ken Peterson at
<br />?:.[SP ~;.m. wi~h the fol!o~ing in attendance:
<br />
<br />~f. f;o~hoherF ~ ~erry Zimmerman Also present:
<br />P~r~ ',',leah ~ ~en Peterson Dexter Mar'sfion
<br />Art 'Ounn ~ ~athy Schneider
<br />
<br />(;hni. wmz, r~ }~en Peter,qon be~n~ the meetin~ b introducing' Dexter Marston
<br />as~! e~ch o~ the CommissiOn members; and then exnlaine~ that the ~ursose
<br />off ~be r~eet~.~' was lnfor~a~monat to answer ques~mons aha feces_ye mnput
<br />q n r~r~amts ho the MissisSippi ~$ver Critical ~rea Plan~
<br />Dewt~,~~ M~rston nresen~e~ ~ sli~e an8 ta~e presentation exnlsininr?: the
<br />~r. noso of the E.0.B. an~ ~,he Land Plannffng Ac~ and then exp!a$~ed ~hat
<br />br ....ou]r be ~oing over ~cb of the enviro~ental so!~cies w~th those
<br />
<br />;';r. tz-~r:i,on was asked b~ a: resident spec5 ficalty whose po!icies v,rere
<br />bn:i~, r?es~.Phed, and ~4r,~ Warston ex?~ained th.st they had been
<br />by him -~fter discus?f.on~ w.~th the Coif, mission. Mr. !,!arston was then asked
<br />:i F lhor::e d~.~cuss~ons had teen pub!ic~ an~ what was the sicnifice, nce~ or
<br />,,,.,~- tb~n just ~unt. ifi. ca~'iOn, for deter~uined vro-oosed changes?
<br />'t,/t~. t'9.'r-:ttor exn]aiBqd t,~a~ [hese were not !aws~ just policies, s',:d that
<br />there hs~l p3_reedy been ~o~e suggested changes from [he Co*ttmfi. ssio-q: and
<br />~hn,, ;.~,pouZh nddi]zion,n]_~mee,ings inclu, ain~ the public a final d~.aet ,,ill
<br />bo dr t,-,-~t,~t[rt~,,q. It v:as $.].So stated that all mee~SnUs had been a.~uart_sea.
<br />
<br />'~btp'i-,~-' T~res~ntntion of the policies, residents stated that they felt the
<br />,/a~',]-~r,,~ 'iv .reFerrals to ,_~.~ op:,es j_ndicated to them th~t_~ there would not be
<br />ar':':?tro~~-, build:ina: of wsl~o~ta a~lowed, h~d that making shoreline nrotection
<br />~'b-. :.~,r~t~onsibi]ity of t~e[owner was Unjust. Another resident r:tated that
<br />b, ~',:~ '... ma(n~:e~ance wa~ the owners ~es]~onr~ibi!ity and not a bsrd~
<br />A~' D~,~s exn]~!ne~ sbot~ funds svailab!e through the Soils Conservation
<br />f;ot.v~c~, for ].':ndo~"uers ' There was also cottq-~ent ~b. at the po]icy regarding
<br />r.~[.~nLin~. . of trees after: ~ub].ic~ or nrivate; constructio~ was too s,.,r..ct.
<br />~f?. M.s¥'c~;on '~rief]_y ex'~sined ~he difference between the Munic~pa! Shore-
<br />q~'ad f.t',sr~de~cs and EQB'~St[a~dards~ along wi_th showing the ?,reser~.t and
<br />nor~nti!'Qe c~,~',,.~C~, on ma~s._ mt_ ~ !,~nr~ Use Policies ,',,,.,e.~ read, but ro
<br />c,~Jr;~'~o[) ooCl)rrod .... ' '
<br /> ., nre .......... tec~ that ....
<br /> . Co:.~e~t fro~ those .... ~t ~c~ +b~v felt
<br />~:r~n':~,s; of Ihs plan sho~-lg have been available so that they could Dave
<br />~',~'.~ hr, t,t,r~Z' nrep'~rod, t~ ~J_scuss it. ~r~-~,, ~.. Pete~so~ e~-~n sin~r~_ ,: ........... that cost
<br />t,.,.qs r, fr, chor ~n mak!ng~conies since this was only s draffi~ end subject
<br />~o ~.~.,r~o~ but that so~e(conies would be av~Snable for those irt
<br />l(on Pr.~c:,rr~on qs~}~e~ for-'any additionel attestSors or co?t~en~,,s: an~ as
<br />i:h~¥ .... ~/orc, ~n-n~ the r~&ating adjourned 9:40 ~.m
<br />
<br />
<br />
|