My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Charter Commission - 02/20/1997 - 1996 Annual Report
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Charter Commission
>
1997
>
Agenda - Charter Commission - 02/20/1997 - 1996 Annual Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2025 10:35:35 AM
Creation date
11/14/2017 9:15:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Title
1996 Annual Report
Document Date
02/20/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 20, 1997 <br />The Honorable Gary Meyer <br />Chief Judge Tenth Judicial District <br />Wright County Courthouse <br />10 Second Street NW - Room 201 <br />Elk River, Minnesota 55330 <br />RE: City of Ramsey, Anoka County, Minnesota Charter Commission Annual <br />Report <br />Dear Judge Meyer: <br />In accordance with Minnesota Statute 410.05, the following is an annual report reflecting <br />the activities of the City of Ramsey Charter Commission during 1996. <br />The Commission met on the following dates: <br />February 1, 1996 <br />April 18, 1996 <br />July 18, 1996 <br />October 10, 1996. <br />At the February meeting, Charter reviewed an ordinance amending the Mayor's term. A <br />couple members of the Council were present to offer input. The Commission approved a <br />motion to amend the language in Chapter 2 of the Ramsey City Charter entitled "Form of <br />Government ", Section 2.3, by adding: Commencing with Election year 2000, the Mayor's <br />term will be lengthened from two years to four years. They voted to forward this to <br />Council for introduction and scheduling of a public hearing. Another item discussed at <br />that meeting was the findings of fact for public improvement petition process. The City <br />Council had directed that the Charter Commission review whether or not Chapter 8 of the <br />City Charter should be amended to prohibit Council from ordering a public improvement <br />project unless more than 50 percent of the benefitting property owners are in favor of it. <br />The Commission determined that 50/50 is the most equitable, there hasn't been that many <br />problems with the current process to date, it is appropriate for Council to be the decision <br />maker in tie situations, and it is not necessary to be more rigorous than State Statutes than <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.