Laserfiche WebLink
None <br /> <br /> riann <br />nber Cich <br />nber Pearson <br />iber DeLuca <br />tuber Peterson <br /> <br />~oted against the same: <br />~bstained: <br /> <br /> · <br /> <br />The motion fog,~th! <br />Pearson and ut~n <br /> May°r~ei <br /> Councilm~ <br /> Councttm¢ <br /> Councili'n{ <br /> Counei ~lme <br />and the folloWing <br /> <br />None <br />and the followifig <br /> <br />Councilmernb~r~ ch introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: I",1~ RESOLUTION 90-01-14 <br />RESoLuTIoN~ CERTIFYING PETITION AND ORDERING THE UPDATING OF <br />FEASIBIL!~Y'~ STUDY FOR WACO STREET N.W. AND WACO DRIVE N.W. <br />BITUMiN0~s ~URFACING IMPROVEMENT (PROJECT #90-01) <br /> WIt]~RE k~ the City has received a petition for a feasibility study to consider the <br />improvement:~f ituminous surfacing for Waco Street N.W. and Waco Drive N.W.; and <br /> WHirlS. El k~, the City Administrator has found the petition to be of the correct percentage <br />of lawful.s~g~tut :S of affected property owners; and <br /> <br /> W~I~I~]Ei tiS, the City Administrator has found the petition to be in accord with the City <br />Charter and M!nn .,Sota Statutes concerning local improvements. <br /> <br />NOW FH~?RE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF RAMSE~,~iANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1 ) A certafn '.!efition requesting a feasibility study to consider the improvement of bituminous <br /> surfacing:for Waco Street N.W. and Waco Drive N.W has been filed with the City Council <br /> on Jai~$aE. g3, 1990. The petition is hereby declared to be signed by the required <br /> perc~n~g~ )f affected property owners. This declaration is made in conformity to the City <br /> of Ran~ e, ordinance 210.01 and Minnesota Statute Chapter 429. <br /> <br />2) The P¢0fid a~ is hereby referred to Peter Raafikka, City Engineer, and he is instructed to <br /> updat~ fe t$ibility study to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council <br /> in a ~irr inary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to the cost <br /> of the I~r~. oJ ~t to each affected property owner. The City Engineer shall also comment as to <br /> wheth,~.; it ~hould be best to be done as proposed or in conjunction with some other <br /> improv~m <br /> <br />3) The abC?e mentioned project shall hereby be referred to as Improvement Project #90-01. <br /> <br /> i adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> 90te being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br /> <br />