My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 01/10/1996 - Public Hearing @ 7:54
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 01/10/1996 - Public Hearing @ 7:54
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 2:40:51 PM
Creation date
7/1/2003 11:05:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Public Hearing @ 7:54
Document Date
01/10/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF RAMSEY <br /> ANOKA COUNTY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />The Ramsey Planning Commission conducted a public heating on Tuesday, January 10, 1996 at <br />the Ramsey Municipal Center, 15153 Nowthen Boulevard N.W., Ramsey, Minnesota to hear <br />input regarding proposed ordinances to amend Chapters 5 and 9 of Ramsey City Code regarding <br />parking and storing vehicles and equipment in residential districts. <br /> <br />Members Present: <br /> <br />Chairperson David Bawden <br />Commissioner Ben Deemer <br />Commissioner Paul Holland <br />Commissioner Charles LaDue <br />Commissioner Michael Terry <br />Commissioner Bradley Thorud <br /> <br />Also Present: <br /> <br />City Engineer Steve Jankowski <br />Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />Chairperson Bawden called the public hearing to order at 7:54 p.m. <br /> <br />PRESENTATION <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik stated that the Planning Commission has been working for several <br />months to draft an ordinance to amend City Code to make provisions for parking and storing <br />commercial vehicles in residential districts. Input on this matter was received at a public hearing <br />held on January 2, 1996, and those minutes will be reviewed along with any input received <br />tonight. Ms. Frolik explained that the proposed ordinances are amending Sections 5.12, 9.02 and <br />9.11 of the Ramsey City Code. <br /> <br />CITIZEN INPUT <br /> <br />Marlys Williams, 5180 157th Lane N.W. - felt that all inoperable junk cars of any type should be <br />included in the amendment to Chapter 5. She declared that inoperable junk vehicles sitting in the <br />open bring down the property values of all the surrounding properties. She suggested that the <br />definitions contained in Section 9.02 "Definitions - Motor Vehicle, Private Use" should be <br />amended to insert the word inoperable before the words vintage/classic cars. She felt that that by <br />doing so it would eliminate any possible ambiguity in the distinction between inoperable junk <br />vehicles covered under Chapter 5 and vehicles covered by Chapter 9. She stated that "unusable, <br />inoperable, deteriorating, retained for salvage parts is the criteria for determining a vehicle to be a <br />junk vehicle under Chapter 5." She commented that Chapter 9 does not state that a vehicle is <br />allowed if inoperable, and therefore, technically these inoperable classic/vintage cars are covered <br />under Chapter 5. Ms. Williams declared that every citizen has the fight to be protected against <br />declining property values caused by the presence of inoperable junk cars stored in the open on <br />neighboring properties. She stated there has been no citizen input at these meetings expressing an <br />interest in storing junk cars in the open, and in addition, there has been no citizen input at these <br />meetings by neighbors of citizens with junk vehicles asking the City to allow their neighbors to <br />continue to store inoperable junk cars in the open. If allowed to remain, she felt these inoperable <br />cars (regardless of classification of vintage/classic/racing) should be required, at a minimum, to <br />have 90% screening from all neighboring properties and public rights of way. She added that the <br /> <br />Public Hearing/Planning Commission/January 10, 1996 <br /> Page I of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.