Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC HEARING <br />BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br />CITY OF RAMSEY <br /> ANOKA COUNTY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />The Ramsey Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing on Thursday, May 27, 1993 at the <br />Ramsey Municipal Center, 15153 Nowthen Boulevard N.W., Ramsey, Minnesota to hear input <br />regarding a request for a variance to construct an accessory structure nearer the front property line <br />than the principal structure; ease of Charles and Jan Hart. <br /> <br />Members Present: <br /> <br />Chairperson Terry Hendriksen <br />Board Member Benjamin Deemer (arrived at 7:32 p.m.) <br />Board Member Charles LaDue <br />Board Member Michael Terry <br />Board Member Bradley Thomd <br /> <br />Members Absent: <br /> <br />Board Member David Bawden <br />Board Member Paul Holland <br /> <br />Also Present: <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />Chairperson Hendriksen called the public hearing to order at 7:31 p.m. <br /> <br />PRESENTATION <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Fmlik stated that Charles and Jan Hart are requesting a variance to construct <br />a 32'x32' accessory garage nearer the front property line than the principal structure at 7230 153rd <br />Lane N.W. Ms. Frolik explained that the developers of the lot located the house 84 feet from the <br />front property line, creating an 84 foot front yard setback. The Harts are proposing to construct an <br />accessory garage approximately 60 feet from the front property line. The Harts are restricted from <br />building their accessory structure in the rear yard because of sharp inclines in topography and <br />dense, mature tree growth. <br /> <br />CITIZEN INPUT <br /> <br />Will Berry, 7220 153rd Lane N.W. - stated he was all in favor of the variance for the garage. <br /> <br />Tom Williams, 5180 157th Lane N.W. - stated he was tired of the City changing its roles, and that <br />he felt the City should either uphold the ordinance or take it off the books. He said his objection <br />had nothing .to do with anyone's particular property, but that it has to do with the roles of the City. <br />He stated the variance would affect many people because it sets a precedent, and that you can't stop <br />it once you deviate from the plan. He added that the applicants understood the setback when they <br />bought the property. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik explained that state statute allows for variances when some physical feature unique to <br />the property creates a hardship; the hardship cannot be created by the property owner. <br /> <br />Board Member LaDue also explained the variance procedure. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hendriksen stated the Board will consider what they have done in the past so that they <br />are consistent. <br /> <br />Public Hearing/Board of Adjustment/May 27, 1993 <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br /> <br />