Laserfiche WebLink
related to the actual minerals in the water. Phosphorus level testing was done with results showing <br />a lower rate up stream to a higher rate down stream (.227, .4275, .6365). The high level phosphorus <br />reading can cause water to have an odor. An explanation was offered for possible causes of a high <br />level reading. Soil sampling can be done in the Spring. The following are present in the water: <br />ammonium, nitrate (no concerns), and in-vivo chlorophyl. <br /> <br />Terrestrial Characteristics (Dan Wheeler) <br />There are four types of turtles, and seven types of toads and frogs. Insects are found at the bottom <br />of the stream, but are not indicative of any conclusions. They can be used to do testing in the future. <br />The DNR was contacted about the possibility of stocking the Brook with fish. Factors relating to the <br />Brook being too shallow and temperature variables do not make the Brook a successful location for <br />stocking. <br /> <br />There were six types of current land use identified: single family (54.89%); vacant agriculture <br />(18.87%); improved agriculture (15.00%); exempt property (6.32%); commercial (3.14%); and <br />utilities (.24%). <br /> <br />Wildlife, vegetation, and soils were the three factors considered in studying development of the area. <br />The dry oak forest, oak woodland brush land, and willow swamp were identified as the three types <br />of vegetation. As well there is reed canary grass and prickly ash - both non-native invasive plants. <br /> <br />Boundaries were considered when conducting soil sampling. The north/south boundaries were <br />established as obvious property, and the east/west were established using Armstrong Boulevard and <br />Highway ~47. Soil samples conducted show the area to be suitable for trail development. There are <br />two types of soil: Hubbard Nymore; and Zimmerman Isanti. (Nymore is the most appropriate for trail <br />development.) <br /> <br />Trail Development (Gunars Ogrins) <br />The three qualities of a trail for consideration of the study were wideness, functional ability, and <br />stability. Four trail surfaces were considered. Those surfaces and corresponding monetary <br />information were provided as follows: <br /> 1) Crushed Limestone ~ $31,900 plus additional options of $6,400 for a total of $38,300. <br /> 2) Asphalt ~ $42,800 plus additional options of $6,400 for a total of $49,200. <br /> 3) Helbrial Pier Shaf~ ~ $426,000 plus additional options for a total of $647,000. <br /> This surface is currently being used by the DNR and was the suggested option of students <br /> who conducted the study. Additional benefits of this surface were presented. <br /> 4) Low Maintenance Trail ~ approximately $6,000. <br /> <br />The proposed location of the trail would entail a total of 4.5 miles. Placement of the trail is <br />recommended for the south side of the Brook. <br /> <br />Trail Maintenance (Dave Myers) <br />Maintenance of a winter trail was discussed. There were three criteria used in maintenance <br />assessment of such a trail: inexpensiveness; easily accessible; and efficiency in grooming. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/December 12, 1996 <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />