My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 12/12/1996
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1996
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 12/12/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 10:25:22 AM
Creation date
7/7/2003 9:12:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
12/12/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Grooming of a trail would be done with a snowmobile pulling a grooming apparatus at a speed of <br />approximately six to eight miles per hour. TidB is a four-foot width grooming model which is <br />comprised ora series of combs which scrape and pack the snow. It can also be equipped with a track <br />setter. The model also uses a retractable blade in the front. For larger amounts of snow fall a roller <br />could be used to compact the snow for grooming completion by the TidB. It was noted the TidB <br />promotes safety and assists in trial preparation during the non-winter season. Cost of grooming <br />equipment is estimated at $1,500 ($500.00 for the TidB and $1,000 for a snowmobile). <br /> <br />Positioning of interpretive signs which would provide directions, information, and assist in safety <br />measures is recommended. <br /> <br />Education (Tracie Wahlberg) <br />Study of vegetation, wildlife identification, and water studies (stream and water quality analyses) are <br />three different types of studies which could be conducted at the Park. This could assist in conjunction <br />with environmental learning canter, but would not necessarily require construction of a building; <br />simply access to the area. <br /> <br />There are schools in the Anoka-Hennepin School District which could potentially use the area. <br />Currently, there are four schools which have expressed interest in utilizing the area. As well, there <br />are other groups (i.e. scouting and cormnunity organizations) which could use the area. <br /> <br />Public Opinion (Valerie Malmquist) <br />There were two approaches used to gather public input about development of the proposed area: <br />public questionnaire; and distribution of a survey to Anoka High School students. Questionnaire and <br />survey responses were favorable for non-motorized trail development. It was noted accompanying <br />issues were examined one of which would be an increase in real estate values for those residents <br />located by near the trail. <br /> <br />Summary (Valerie Malmquist) <br />Public response indicates residents desire a trail which is located in a east/west direction. <br /> <br />Questions Posed to Presenters <br />In response to the City Administrator, the sample size (people surveyed) results show that 389 or <br />79% favor a trail, 67 or 14% oppose a trail, and 39 or 7% are undecided. <br /> <br />Chairperson Cook referred to the heightened phosphorus levels and inquired whether this was due <br />in part to runoff from fertilizers applied to lawns fi-om area residents. Mitch Allen was unable to <br />provide a concrete conclusion. He recommended taking additional water samples at different seasons <br />in the three areas where samples were previously retrieved. <br /> <br />Ms. Malmquist expressed her appreciation to everyone present. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/December 12, 1996 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.