Laserfiche WebLink
City of Ramsey <br />May 30, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The sections which fail to provide sufficient guidance regarding permissible and <br />impermissible uses in Subdivision 4 are as follows: <br /> <br /> 1) Section c includes some guidelines for the types of businesses which are not <br />permissible, but the zoning code provides no guidance on the types of businesses which <br />ar.e permissible. That leaves a great deal of discretion with city officials to grant and <br />deny permits without any guidelines to assure consistency in the application of the <br />zoning code, and gives a potential user of the property little guidance on what type of <br />business is permissible. <br /> <br /> 2) In Section D, the distinction between accessory structures adjacent to a <br />principal structure, and those not containing a principal structure is arbitrary and <br />capricious. Why should one be allowed four additional employees and the other only be <br />allowed 17 Both should be allowed the same number of employees. Also, there is no <br />analysis as to whether 4 additional employees is a useful limitation, given the size of <br />permissible accessory structures and the acreage of a particular parcel. Again, we <br />believe that a 10 acre parcel can support a business with as many as ten additional <br />employees without burdening the neighborhood. The counsel agreed when a cabinet <br />manufacturer applied for a permit. <br /> <br /> 3) In Section e, the code provides no objective guidelines or standards as t° what <br />constitutes "excessive" vehicular traffic. I propose a limit on the hours of traffic, between <br />the hours of 8:00 am and 8:00 pm, and on the number of customer visits per day. <br /> <br /> 4) In section h, the code provides no objective guidelines or standards as to what <br />constitutes a fire hazard to neighboring residences, adversely affecting neighborhood <br />property values, or constitute a nuisance, or be detrimental because of noise, odors, or <br />other circumstances. We proposed adopting the standards set forth in Oak Grove's <br />zoning code, tying the prohibitions to storage of defined quantities and types of <br />flammable and hazardous substances. <br /> <br /> As to concerns about property values, aesthetics, noise concerns, etc., most <br />other city ordinances impose requirements for exterior appearances of the buildings (i.e. <br />types of siding, screening, etc), impose restrictions on the days and hours of operation, <br />and restrictions on the types of chemicals used on site. Those standards are objective <br />and easier to interpret, and easier to enforce consistently. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />