My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/10/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2002
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/10/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:53:35 AM
Creation date
7/8/2003 11:17:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/10/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Corkle replied that that would not be the case if they assumed that everyone left their homes <br />at the same time. The numbers referenced in the study were done for the peak hours of 6:30 a.m. <br />to 7:30 a.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sweet stated that she is concerned with the overall impact of the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Corkl'e replied that they estimated that there would be 2,000 trips from the development in a <br />24 hour period. 20 percent of those trips would go down Dysprosium Street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated that there are serious issues along Dysprosium Street and the City <br />does have some responsibility on resolving those concerns. <br /> <br />Mr. Black stated that the peninsula is an area where there will be City sewer and water, which is <br />quite different than the areas that are developed with ~ acre to 1 'A acre. They have already <br />reduced the number of lots on the peninsula and the smallest lot would be 18,000 square feet and <br />largest lot would be 1 ½ acres. During the neighborhood meeting he had requested an <br />opportunity to determine what type of home could be built on the "dog house" lot and if it was <br />not feasible to build on, then they would split the lot. He explained that the peninsula homes will <br />be the most expensive homes in the development ranging from $250,000 to $400,000 and they <br />will keep those lots custom lots. Mr. Black presented a picture of two story 2,300 square foot <br />two level home built at a minimum of $250,000 that would fit on the "dog house" lot. If that <br />home were built on .that lot they would be abiding by the 35 foot front yard setback and 50 foot <br />rear yard setback. ~ <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski explained that the DNR has jurisdiction up to the ordinary high water <br />mark and very typically there is a buffer wetland that goes beyond that point a couple feet higher <br />which is under the restrictions of the WMO. When the' delineation of the site is completed they <br />will pick up where the boundary of the wetland is and then verify that with the WMO, then an <br />easement will be placed over the wetland. He also explained that the volume of retention ponds <br />being proposed is a function that will be looked at by the WMO engineer. In regards to the <br />comments made regarding the water levels of the existing wetlands, the entire project is within the <br />same water subdistrict and all of the run-off will stay within the district. He does not anticipate <br />that there be will be an impact on the ground water levels. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired in regards to the large drainage pond being proposed. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that the ponds will need to be constructed to NERP standards, <br />which at the water level .there will be a 10 to 1 bench to prevent a steep slope. <br /> <br />Dave Putnam, Engineer, Midwest Land Surveyors, stated that the pond that is identified and <br />located in the proposed location because it is where it will function for the site. The location <br />suggested by residents for the pond would place the retention pond in a natural low area which is <br />a designated wetland and they are not allowed to pond in that area. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 15 of 28 <br /> <br />-37- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.