Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 07/11/2002

Home

Commissioner Rolfe asked when in the process will the installation of the projects in the greenspace occur. Mr. Rudy answered this must be done at the end stages. Mr. Rudy pointed out the units that will be moved to the other side of Fluorine Street will have access from the City road. Vice Chair Johns asked if the applicant has planned demographics for this land. Mr. Rudy stated he does, but he didn't have them with him. He added they will change. He described the units stating they are all 2 bedroom with a rec. room, and could possibly be 3 bedrooms. The units are approximately 1,660 square feet. He said the units can have a deck. He said they are considering offering four-season decks on some units. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos noted page 33 of the agenda shows one rendition. He. suggested moving the trail to the opposite side of Fluorine Street, since the comer of Fluorine will be straightened. Commissioner Rolfe posed the question if a trailway were constructed through the development, should it be bituminous. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos answered 'it should be bituminous. He explained it is becoming necessary to provide snow removal from the trails. He pointed out the trails should be at least8- feet wide for the safety of people to pass each other. He also noted the townhome project will have a 5-foot sidewalks. He said the 8-foot trail would then replace the sidewalk on one side. Commissioner Rolfe asked if there will be room for the trail with the setback. Mr. Rudy replied they are trying to meet the 25-foot setback from the property line, and this will leave ample room for the trail. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos indicated this project may be resubmitted to the Parks and Recreation Commission if there is substantial change. Commissioner Rolfe questioned if a trail parallel to T.H. #47 to the marsh should be considered. He added he would recommend accepting the proposal with the trail going through the development. He said one reason for this is that it will be quieter there since the soundwall is required along T.I-I. #47. He suggested a discussion take place regarding trails going through subdivisions. However, he noted in this case, it may be the only option. He further questioned if any park land dedication is being required. He also asked if the developer is proposing greenspace that would be consistent for townhomes. He inquired if the trail along Germanium would be better going to the west rather than the east. Commissioner Olds pointed out the trail may have to cross the street. Park and Recreation Commission/April 11, 2002 Page 3 of 14