Laserfiche WebLink
The townhomes will be subject to a site plan review at a future date for all other <br />proposal including but not limited to architectural standards, off-street <br />setbacks, and landscaping. The results of the site plan review may impact the <br />townhomes to be developed on the property. <br /> <br />The R-2 Zoning District does not have a rain/mum lot size for townhouse <br />2 District does require certain setbacks. All structures must be setback <br />boundary line. It appears that all of the townhouse umts meet this <br />District, townhouses must be setback 25 feet fi.om the public <br />edge of curb of the private Street. It appears that all <br />public street. However, several lots having access on <br />setback requirements nor the minimum driveway width.~ <br />and Lots 3-10, Block 3 appear to be deficient. <br />regarding those units. The single-family lots meet <br />by City Ordinances. <br /> <br /> from the <br /> the <br /> feet from the <br /> setback from the <br /> ~,.~' <br />appear not to meet the <br /> 1 1 and 12, Block <br /> [ding further detail <br /> required <br /> <br />City Ordinances require townhome developments to be served <br />collectors that are private streets. <br />streets are determined by the type <br />meet the private street standards.,. <br />Alpine Dr. and Sunfish Lake. <br />Anoka County approval. <br />properties to the north, east, and west. <br /> <br /> street,, and driveway <br />Under City Ordinances, the the private <br /> appear to <br /> ~posing to provid iic 'roads to access <br /> on Sunf~?Lake Blvd. will need <br /> accesses that will serve <br /> <br />Under City <br />development <br />meets this <br />together <br /> <br />that ~,i$~( <br />COFfllTlOn <br /> <br />space for <br />open <br /> <br /> a minimum of 40% of the <br /> of its residents. The preliminary plat <br /> open space is required to be grouped <br /> as common space. In the sketch plan, the <br /> will be constructing a community building <br />The City will count this as meeting the 10% <br />community building is not built, the developer will <br /> <br /> b~ responsible .g the required common space in future phases. <br /> <br /> The 'cte~er has sulS~ed ~i:~Vee protection plan. Currently the City has no ordinances <br /> govermn~¢~ preservataOm~ :,~6wever, a task force has been set up to prepare an ordinance <br /> govermng ~:_.~:~reserva~?At this nme, the plan appears to be generally acceptable, but the <br /> . . '~:~ ,~a,,,~v: . ..... <br /> C~ty ~s encour~g the developer to work closely w~th C~ty Staff to ~dentffy add~Uonal areas for <br /> tree prorecrlon. J,~j <br /> <br />,:;~,; :¢;: The project..j.~:~also subject to the revtew and perrmttmg process of the Lower Rum River <br /> "~:~:~atershcd~agement Organization (WMO) and 1VI-PgA. <br /> <br /> Pa~'~i~cation and trail issues will be discussed at the August 8, 2002 Park Commission <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />