Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 09/20/2001

Home

NE ¼ of said SW ¼ of Section 25 a distance of 763.04 feet to a point on said line distant 558.02 feet easterly of the NW comer of the NE ¼ of said SW ¼ and the point ofbegirm.ing of the property to be described; thence South 00 degrees 22 minutes 40 seconds West 83.31 feet; thence South 85 degrees 34 minutes 26 seconds East 274.38 feet; thence northeasterly 164.31 feet along a non-tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of215 and a central angle of 43 degrees 47 minutes 14 seconds; thence North 89 degrees 21 minutes 46 seconds East, not tangent to said curve, 106.76 feet to the centerline of State Trunk Highway No. 47; thence northerly 51.70 feet along said centerline to said north line of the NE ¼ of the SW ¼ of Section 25, thence South 89 degrees 21 minutes 46 seconds West 468.34 feet to the point of beginning. Except the easterly 60.00 feet thereof to be dedicated for highway purposes at the time of platting. 4. That the total area of the property to be rezoned is 10.05 acres in size. That the proposed rezoning is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MU-SA) boundary. That the Subject Property is currently zoned B-1 Business and R-3U Residential and the surrounding adjacent properties are zoned B-1 Business to the north; B-1 Business, B-2 Business, and Multiple Residential to the south; R-3U .Residential and R-1 Residential to the east and west. That the Applicant is proposing to develop their land to provide for apartment buildings for senior citizens. That the applicant is proposing a rezoning that is consistent with the proposed Higk Density Resident/al land use designation contained in the March 2001 Draft Comprehensive Plan. That the proposed zoning amendment wilt/will no't substantially adversely impair the use or market value of any surrounding property. 10. That the proposed zoning amendment will/Mil not change the essential character of the area, ..which is residential. 11. That the existing road infrastructure Will/will not be capable of accommodating, in a safe manner, the additional traffic to be generated by the rezoned property. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember .... and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: RESOLUTION #01-09- Page 2 of 3 57